Skip to content

Conversation

@kaczmarczyck
Copy link
Collaborator

Addresses the last comment on #747 . Plus a bit more, my local nightly wasn't fully up to date.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @kaczmarczyck, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

I've made a series of small but important updates across the codebase to align with more recent Rust nightly linting rules. Specifically, these changes involve explicitly adding the '_ lifetime specifier to several function signatures where the compiler now requires it for lifetime elision. This ensures that the code remains compatible with the latest nightly toolchains and passes all relevant lints, addressing previous feedback and bringing my local environment up to date.

Highlights

  • Explicit Lifetime for Writer: I've updated the new function in libraries/cbor/src/writer.rs to explicitly specify the elided lifetime '_ for the Writer type in its return signature.
  • Explicit Lifetime for ProcessedPacket: I've modified the process_single_packet function in libraries/opensk/src/ctap/hid/mod.rs to include the explicit elided lifetime '_ for the ProcessedPacket type in its return signature.
  • Explicit Lifetime for Cow: I've updated the read_slice function in src/env/tock/phantom_buffer_storage.rs to explicitly specify the elided lifetime '_ for the Cow type in its return signature.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses lints from a more recent Rust nightly compiler by making elided lifetimes explicit in function return types. The changes in cbor/src/writer.rs, opensk/src/ctap/hid/mod.rs, and env/tock/phantom_buffer_storage.rs are correct and improve code clarity. The overall code quality is high, and I have no further suggestions. The changes look good to merge.

@kaczmarczyck kaczmarczyck requested a review from ia0 August 5, 2025 08:33
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 97.15%. remained the same
when pulling 6eed52e on kaczmarczyck:clippy-nightly
into f8824ab on google:develop.

@kaczmarczyck kaczmarczyck merged commit d3bde3e into google:develop Aug 5, 2025
9 checks passed
@kaczmarczyck kaczmarczyck deleted the clippy-nightly branch August 5, 2025 08:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants