Skip to content

Add Eco surf extension #31

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 5, 2025

Conversation

jenovateurs
Copy link
Contributor

Hello :-),
I’d like to suggest adding Eco Surf Analyser, a great tool that helps raise awareness and promote more sustainable browsing habits.

Thanks for considering, and have a wonderful day! 🌱

@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 23, 2025 19:46
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds an entry for a new sustainability browser extension to the list of eco-friendly tools in the README.

  • Adds an entry for a new browser extension offering sustainability scores for websites.
  • Updates the sustainability tools list with the new extension details.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

README.md:92

  • [nitpick] The entry name 'estimate-good-website' seems inconsistent with the PR title 'Add Eco surf extension'. Consider aligning the tool's name to reflect 'Eco Surf Analyser' or a similar consistent naming convention.
- [estimate-good-website](https://github.com/les-enovateurs/estimate-good-website): A browser extension that provides sustainability scores for websites, helping users understand the environmental impact of their browsing habits.

@michael-s-ashida michael-s-ashida merged commit bd0b3f4 into github:main May 5, 2025
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants