-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.4k
Add support for memory mapping models #586
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ef9afe1
Add mmap support for model files
slaren 7961493
Fix ggml_init_params in quantize
slaren e6f1c19
Make mmap_file static
slaren baa529e
Unmap the file in llama_free
slaren 3f5f428
Always initialize mm_addr and mm_length in llama_model
slaren f789d8d
Initial windows support (untested)
slaren File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Recommended:
#ifdef __has_include
#if __has_include(<sys/mman.h>)
#include <sys/mman.h>
#endif
#if __has_include(<fcntl.h>)
#include <fcntl.h>
#endif
#if __has_include(<unistd.h>)
#include <unistd.h>
#endif
#elif defined (unix) || defined (APPLE)
include <sys/mman.h>
include <fcntl.h>
include <unistd.h>
#endif
Due to:
ggml.c line 101
#ifdef __has_include
#if __has_include(<sys/mman.h>)
#undef GGML_MLOCK_SUPPORT
#define GGML_MLOCK_SUPPORT 1
#include <sys/mman.h>
#endif
#endif
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ggml.c is C, but this is C++ however and currently we are compiling with
-std=c++11
, and__has_include
is C++17. Do you know of any platforms that may fail with the current implementation?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The thing is it would not fail with any platforms because #ifdef __has_include will ignore the definition if __has_include macro does not exist.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand, but in practical terms what are the advantages of doing that instead? Do you know of any specific platform that may fail with the current code?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The advantages are if a person created their own implementation of mmap the code will use their implementation instead, and it decreases the amount of work to support another platform.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@CoderRC I've created a new mmap() pull request #613 that's rebased on this change. I took special care to make sure your mmap preprocessor macro is included. Please take a look!