fix(jni): update proguard rules

[buenaflor]

📜 Description

💡 Motivation and Context

Running the app in release means the native java symbols names are obfuscated so we need to add additional rules for keeping them in their original names for JNI to work properly

Closes #3030

💚 How did you test it?

📝 Checklist

• I reviewed submitted code
• I added tests to verify changes
• No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPii is enabled
• I updated the docs if needed
• All tests passing
• No breaking changes

🔮 Next steps

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.79%. Comparing base (6ba4675) to head (de58d7d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...r/lib/src/native/java/android_replay_recorder.dart	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3036      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.97%   89.79%   +1.81%     
==========================================
  Files         287       96     -191     
  Lines        9533     3331    -6202     
==========================================
- Hits         8387     2991    -5396     
+ Misses       1146      340     -806     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

🚨 Detected changes in high risk code 🚨

High-risk code has higher potential to break the SDK and may be hard to test. To prevent severe bugs, apply the rollout process for releasing such changes and be extra careful when changing and reviewing these files:

• flutter/lib/src/native/java/android_replay_recorder.dart

[github-actions]

Android Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	455.87 ms	519.36 ms	63.49 ms
Size	6.54 MiB	7.55 MiB	1.01 MiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
827bf09	475.40 ms	547.14 ms	71.74 ms
c8596a6	474.00 ms	492.96 ms	18.96 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
827bf09	6.54 MiB	7.53 MiB	1015.27 KiB
c8596a6	6.54 MiB	7.53 MiB	1015.27 KiB

Previous results on branch: fix/jni-proguard-rules

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
1936c70	452.44 ms	508.08 ms	55.64 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
1936c70	6.54 MiB	7.55 MiB	1.01 MiB

[github-actions]

iOS Performance metrics 🚀

	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
Startup time	1258.94 ms	1271.08 ms	12.14 ms
Size	7.86 MiB	9.44 MiB	1.58 MiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
827bf09	1261.86 ms	1276.41 ms	14.55 ms
c8596a6	1234.11 ms	1241.19 ms	7.08 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
827bf09	7.86 MiB	9.44 MiB	1.58 MiB
c8596a6	7.86 MiB	9.44 MiB	1.58 MiB

Previous results on branch: fix/jni-proguard-rules

Startup times

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
1936c70	1257.22 ms	1269.42 ms	12.20 ms

App size

Revision	Plain	With Sentry	Diff
1936c70	7.86 MiB	9.44 MiB	1.58 MiB

[denrase]

Is there any way we can verify that this does the correct thing? Integration test with Android release build on CI maybe?

[buenaflor]

@denrase I tested it locally and the user confirmed it works in the issue

[buenaflor]

we can in the future set up better integration tests with maestro

[vaind]

I know this is merged but maybe worth following up with a change to keep all io.sentry.* classes

[buenaflor]

yeah sounds good 👍