Skip to content

Conversation

@shohag121
Copy link
Member

@shohag121 shohag121 commented Nov 5, 2025

…reports

All Submissions:

  • My code follow the WordPress' coding standards
  • My code satisfies feature requirements
  • My code is tested
  • My code passes the PHPCS tests
  • My code has proper inline documentation
  • I've included related pull request(s) (optional)
  • I've included developer documentation (optional)
  • I've added proper labels to this pull request

Changes proposed in this Pull Request:

Related Pull Request(s)

  • Full PR Link

Closes

  • Closes #

How to test the changes in this Pull Request:

  • Steps or issue link

Changelog entry

Title

Detailed Description of the pull request. What was previous behaviour
and what will be changed in this PR.

Before Changes

Describe the issue before changes with screenshots(s).

After Changes

Describe the issue after changes with screenshot(s).

Feature Video (optional)

Link of detailed video if this PR is for a feature.

PR Self Review Checklist:

  • Code is not following code style guidelines
  • Bad naming: make sure you would understand your code if you read it a few months from now.
  • KISS: Keep it simple, Sweetie (not stupid!).
  • DRY: Don't Repeat Yourself.
  • Code that is not readable: too many nested 'if's are a bad sign.
  • Performance issues
  • Complicated constructions that need refactoring or comments: code should almost always be self-explanatory.
  • Grammar errors.

FOR PR REVIEWER ONLY:

As a reviewer, your feedback should be focused on the idea, not the person. Seek to understand, be respectful, and focus on constructive dialog.

As a contributor, your responsibility is to learn from suggestions and iterate your pull request should it be needed based on feedback. Seek to collaborate and produce the best possible contribution to the greater whole.

  • Correct — Does the change do what it’s supposed to? ie: code 100% fulfilling the requirements?
  • Secure — Would a nefarious party find some way to exploit this change? ie: everything is sanitized/escaped appropriately for any SQL or XSS injection possibilities?
  • Readable — Will your future self be able to understand this change months down the road?
  • Elegant — Does the change fit aesthetically within the overall style and architecture?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Expanded admin panel to support two additional sections: subscriptions and abuse reports, providing administrators with enhanced management capabilities.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 5, 2025

Walkthrough

The PR expands the PanelSwitch component's list of supported admin panel keys by adding two new entries: 'subscriptions' and 'abuse-reports'. No logic or control-flow modifications are present; the component retains all existing guards and URL construction behavior.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Admin Panel Switcher
src/admin/panel-switcher/PanelSwitch.tsx
Added 'subscriptions' and 'abuse-reports' to the default supported admin panel keys array

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 Two new panels hop into view,
Subscriptions and reports, shiny and new,
The switcher grows strong with each gentle add,
Admin controls blooming—hippity-hop, how glad! 🎉

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The PR description is incomplete. While it includes the template structure, all key sections—Changes proposed, Related PRs, Closes, How to test, Changelog entry, Before/After Changes—lack substantive content and remain blank or contain placeholder text. Fill in the critical sections: describe the specific changes made, outline testing steps, provide a changelog entry with before/after behavior, and include any relevant issue references or screenshots.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main change: extending the panel switcher to support subscriptions and abuse reports. It is specific, concise, and directly related to the primary modification in the changeset.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch update/admin-dashboard-version-switch

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be5afb8 and b6d5b75.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/admin/panel-switcher/PanelSwitch.tsx (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: e2e tests (3, 3)
  • GitHub Check: e2e tests (1, 3)
  • GitHub Check: e2e tests (2, 3)
  • GitHub Check: api tests (1, 1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/admin/panel-switcher/PanelSwitch.tsx (1)

17-24: LGTM! Backend properly supports both new panel keys.

The backend implementation in LegacySwitcher.php uses a generic, filter-based system that automatically supports any legacy_key value. The function get_custom_transient_key() falls back to the original key if not explicitly mapped, and the endpoint extraction via str_replace() correctly handles both 'subscriptions' and 'abuse-reports' (which contain no 'dashboard' substring to remove). Test data confirms both admin pages already exist and are accessible at their expected routes.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@shohag121 shohag121 self-assigned this Nov 5, 2025
@shohag121 shohag121 added Needs: Testing This requires further testing Needs: Dev Review It requires a developer review and approval labels Nov 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Needs: Dev Review It requires a developer review and approval Needs: Testing This requires further testing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants