Skip to content

Conversation

gardener-github-actions[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Release Notes:

[github.com/gardener/machine-controller-manager:v0.59.0]

[gardener/machine-controller-manager]

✨ New Features

  • [OPERATOR] machine-controller-manager can manage machines without a target cluster by specifying --target-kubeconfig=none. See the documentation for more details. by @timebertt [#1004]

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • [OPERATOR] Fix a bug where MCM does not check if a pod has already been evicted before reattempting eviction blindly by @aaronfern [#979]
  • [OPERATOR] Fixed a bug in the MachineSet controller where the machine status was set to Terminating even if attempt to delete the machine object failed. by @takoverflow [#995]

🏃 Others

  • [OPERATOR] add new label node_name to the mcm_machine_info metric by @aaronfern [#1000]
  • [OPERATOR] machine-controller-manager base image is updated to gcr.io/distroless/static-debian12:nonroot. by @aaronfern [#991]

Container (OCI) Images

  • machine-controller-manager: europe-docker.pkg.dev/gardener-project/releases/gardener/machine-controller-manager:v0.59.0

[github.com/gardener/machine-controller-manager:v0.60.0]

✨ New Features

  • [OPERATOR] When running without a target cluster machine-controller-manager will report a new status field addresses by @maboehm [#1012]
  • [OPERATOR] Machine Class now has VirtualCapacity field hat maps to WorkerPool's NodeTemplate VirtualCapacity. by @elankath [#1024]

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • [OPERATOR] Fixed metric mcm_machine_set_failed_machines and underlying variable *machineSet.Status.FailedMachines so that they reflect the current state of machines by @gagan16k [#1025]
  • [USER] Fixed checking of createMachineTimeout when machine is Pending by @thiyyakat [#1015]
  • [OPERATOR] Fixed a bug where machines in the InPlaceUpdating phase were incorrectly transferred to the new machine set during inplace updates. This caused the machine controller to miss updating the phase to InPlaceUpdateSuccessful, resulting in machines getting stuck or marked as InPlaceUpdateFailed. by @acumino [#1020]

🏃 Others

  • [OPERATOR] node.gardener.cloud/critical-components-not-ready taint is added to the node after the successful in-place update to prevent scheduling any workload before critical component pods are ready. by @acumino [#1017]
  • [OPERATOR] export testresults as inlined ocm-resource by @heldkat [#1022]
  • [DEVELOPER] migrate CICD-Pipeline to GitHub-Actions by @ccwienk [#1011]
  • [OPERATOR] Add informational logging for MachineDeployment rollout events by @gagan16k [#1029]
  • [DEVELOPER] Convert .reuse/dep5 to REUSE.toml. by @thiyyakat [#1026]

BoM Diff

Added components: 0
Changed components: 1
Removed components: 0

Changed Components:

⚙ github.com/gardener/machine-controller-manager: v0.58.0 → v0.60.0

Component Details:

⚙ github.com/gardener/machine-controller-manager:v0.58.0 → v0.60.0
Resource Version Change
➕ gosec-report v0.60.0
➕ test-results v0.60.0
➕ release-notes-archive v0.60.0
➖ check-build-step-log v0.58.0
🔄 machine-controller-managerv0.58.0 → v0.60.0
🔄 release-notes v0.58.0 → v0.60.0

@gardener-github-actions gardener-github-actions bot requested review from a team as code owners August 29, 2025 12:03
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Aug 29, 2025
@gardener-robot-ci-3
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @gardener-github-actions[bot] for your contribution. Before I can start building your PR, a member of the organization must set the required label(s) {'reviewed/ok-to-test'}. Once started, you can check the build status in the PR checks section below.

@timebertt
Copy link
Member

@gardener/mcm-maintainers @gardener/gardener-extension-provider-openstack-maintainers
Can we merge this?

Copy link
Contributor

@hebelsan hebelsan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging and removed needs/review Needs review labels Sep 4, 2025
@hebelsan hebelsan merged commit e17baa6 into master Sep 4, 2025
28 checks passed
@hebelsan hebelsan deleted the ci-qwzwnzbbm branch September 4, 2025 07:47
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Sep 4, 2025
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added the status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) label Sep 4, 2025
@timebertt
Copy link
Member

@hebelsan should we also cut a new release of this repository? It's been a while 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) size/m Size of pull request is medium (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants