Skip to content

test: display the cpu template name #5230

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 29, 2025

Conversation

emmanuel-ferdman
Copy link
Contributor

Changes

This small PR evaluates the displays the cpu template name in the test skip message.

Reason

License Acceptance

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under
the terms of the Apache 2.0 license. For more information on following Developer
Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check
CONTRIBUTING.md.

PR Checklist

  • I have read and understand CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • I have run tools/devtool checkstyle to verify that the PR passes the
    automated style checks.
  • I have described what is done in these changes, why they are needed, and
    how they are solving the problem in a clear and encompassing way.
  • I have updated any relevant documentation (both in code and in the docs)
    in the PR.
  • I have mentioned all user-facing changes in CHANGELOG.md.
  • If a specific issue led to this PR, this PR closes the issue.
  • When making API changes, I have followed the
    Runbook for Firecracker API changes.
  • I have tested all new and changed functionalities in unit tests and/or
    integration tests.
  • I have linked an issue to every new TODO.

  • This functionality cannot be added in rust-vmm.

@roypat
Copy link
Contributor

roypat commented May 29, 2025

Thanks! Could you add a body to your commit message, please? Just something along the lines of that the skip message tried to interpolate a variable, just didn't contain the 'f' prefix, so that didn't actually work.

@emmanuel-ferdman
Copy link
Contributor Author

@roypat sure, done 😄

@roypat
Copy link
Contributor

roypat commented May 29, 2025

@roypat sure, done 😄

and please line-wrap it at 72 characters :)

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 29, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.94%. Comparing base (0952a22) to head (ceb18f6).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5230      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.89%   82.94%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         250      250              
  Lines       26965    26965              
==========================================
+ Hits        22353    22367      +14     
+ Misses       4612     4598      -14     
Flag Coverage Δ
5.10-c5n.metal 83.39% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m5n.metal 83.39% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6a.metal 82.61% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m6g.metal 79.22% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m6i.metal 83.38% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
5.10-m7a.metal-48xl 82.59% <ø> (?)
5.10-m7g.metal 79.22% <ø> (ø)
5.10-m7i.metal-24xl 83.34% <ø> (?)
5.10-m7i.metal-48xl 83.34% <ø> (?)
5.10-m8g.metal-24xl 79.21% <ø> (?)
5.10-m8g.metal-48xl 79.22% <ø> (?)
6.1-c5n.metal 83.43% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m5n.metal 83.43% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
6.1-m6a.metal 82.65% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6g.metal 79.22% <ø> (ø)
6.1-m6i.metal 83.43% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7a.metal-48xl 82.63% <ø> (?)
6.1-m7g.metal 79.22% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
6.1-m7i.metal-24xl 83.44% <ø> (?)
6.1-m7i.metal-48xl 83.44% <ø> (?)
6.1-m8g.metal-24xl 79.21% <ø> (?)
6.1-m8g.metal-48xl 79.22% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

The skip message attempted to interpolate a variable,
but was missing the 'f' prefix, so the variable wasn't substituted.

Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Ferdman <emmanuelferdman@gmail.com>
@roypat roypat added the Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed label May 29, 2025
@roypat roypat enabled auto-merge (rebase) May 29, 2025 08:29
@roypat roypat merged commit 10dfa03 into firecracker-microvm:main May 29, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Awaiting review Indicates that a pull request is ready to be reviewed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants