Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 11, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change Age Confidence
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed
@eslint/js (source) devDependencies minor 9.32.0 -> 9.33.0 age confidence
@types/node (source) devDependencies patch 22.17.0 -> 22.17.2 age confidence
actions/cache action patch v4.2.3 -> v4.2.4 age confidence
esbuild devDependencies patch 0.25.8 -> 0.25.9 age confidence
eslint (source) devDependencies minor 9.32.0 -> 9.33.0 age confidence
fs-extra dependencies patch 11.3.0 -> 11.3.1 age confidence
tsx (source) devDependencies patch 4.20.3 -> 4.20.4 age confidence
typescript-eslint (source) devDependencies minor 8.39.0 -> 8.40.0 age confidence

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Release Notes

eslint/eslint (@​eslint/js)

v9.33.0

Compare Source

actions/cache (actions/cache)

v4.2.4

Compare Source

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: actions/cache@v4...v4.2.4

evanw/esbuild (esbuild)

v0.25.9

Compare Source

  • Better support building projects that use Yarn on Windows (#​3131, #​3663)

    With this release, you can now use esbuild to bundle projects that use Yarn Plug'n'Play on Windows on drives other than the C: drive. The problem was as follows:

    1. Yarn in Plug'n'Play mode on Windows stores its global module cache on the C: drive
    2. Some developers put their projects on the D: drive
    3. Yarn generates relative paths that use ../.. to get from the project directory to the cache directory
    4. Windows-style paths don't support directory traversal between drives via .. (so D:\.. is just D:)
    5. I didn't have access to a Windows machine for testing this edge case

    Yarn works around this edge case by pretending Windows-style paths beginning with C:\ are actually Unix-style paths beginning with /C:/, so the ../.. path segments are able to navigate across drives inside Yarn's implementation. This was broken for a long time in esbuild but I finally got access to a Windows machine and was able to debug and fix this edge case. So you should now be able to bundle these projects with esbuild.

  • Preserve parentheses around function expressions (#​4252)

    The V8 JavaScript VM uses parentheses around function expressions as an optimization hint to immediately compile the function. Otherwise the function would be lazily-compiled, which has additional overhead if that function is always called immediately as lazy compilation involves parsing the function twice. You can read V8's blog post about this for more details.

    Previously esbuild did not represent parentheses around functions in the AST so they were lost during compilation. With this change, esbuild will now preserve parentheses around function expressions when they are present in the original source code. This means these optimization hints will not be lost when bundling with esbuild. In addition, esbuild will now automatically add this optimization hint to immediately-invoked function expressions. Here's an example:

    // Original code
    const fn0 = () => 0
    const fn1 = (() => 1)
    console.log(fn0, function() { return fn1() }())
    
    // Old output
    const fn0 = () => 0;
    const fn1 = () => 1;
    console.log(fn0, function() {
      return fn1();
    }());
    
    // New output
    const fn0 = () => 0;
    const fn1 = (() => 1);
    console.log(fn0, (function() {
      return fn1();
    })());

    Note that you do not want to wrap all function expressions in parentheses. This optimization hint should only be used for functions that are called on initial load. Using this hint for functions that are not called on initial load will unnecessarily delay the initial load. Again, see V8's blog post linked above for details.

  • Update Go from 1.23.10 to 1.23.12 (#​4257, #​4258)

    This should have no effect on existing code as this version change does not change Go's operating system support. It may remove certain false positive reports (specifically CVE-2025-4674 and CVE-2025-47907) from vulnerability scanners that only detect which version of the Go compiler esbuild uses.

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.33.0

Compare Source

jprichardson/node-fs-extra (fs-extra)

v11.3.1

Compare Source

  • Fix case where move/moveSync could incorrectly think files are identical on Windows (#​1050)
privatenumber/tsx (tsx)

v4.20.4

Compare Source

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (typescript-eslint)

v8.40.0

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • typescript-eslint: export plugin, parser, and configs that are compatible with both defineConfig() and tseslint.config() (#​11475)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.39.1

Compare Source

🩹 Fixes
  • typescript-eslint: handle file:// urls in stack trace when inferring tsconfigRootDir (#​11464)
❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM, only on Monday ( * 0-3 * * 1 ) (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/all-non-major branch 5 times, most recently from af70201 to f3064be Compare August 15, 2025 10:49
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/all-non-major branch from f3064be to 5f98326 Compare August 18, 2025 17:43
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/all-non-major branch from 5f98326 to 210e17e Compare August 19, 2025 05:54
Copy link

@firecow firecow merged commit 2494389 into master Aug 19, 2025
11 checks passed
@firecow firecow deleted the renovate/all-non-major branch August 19, 2025 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant