Add logic for reverse boolean weak dependencies

[seryan-rh]

No description provided.

[tdawson]

What is needed for this? Is it just testing and verifying?
If that's all it needs, I've got my testing system setup and can run it through.

[seryan-rh]

Yes it is just testing and verifying please. Thanks Troy

[tdawson]

OK, I can do that. It might not be done today, but I'll upload the output somewhere so you all can look at it.

[tdawson]

The output and logs are here:
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/eln/weak-deps-output.tgz
https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/eln/weak-deps-logs.tgz

What are a few good packages to check?

[seryan-rh]

The ones I mostly used to check were the hunspell packages. In particular hunspell-ru should contain hunspell and langpacks-ru.

[tdawson]

Yep, looks like it works.
hunspell-am has a "Reverse boolean Weak runtime dependency" of hunspell and lanpacks-am
hunspell-ru has a "Reverse boolean Weak runtime dependency" of hunspell and lanpacks-ru

I'm giving this a thumbs up.

[yselkowitz]

@seryan-rh just one minor wording change.

@tdawson this didn't significantly change the processing time, did it?

[tdawson]

@tdawson this didn't significantly change the processing time, did it?

My testing machine get's very different times than the production machine.
That being said, the time is fairly close to other tests I've run. So, from what I see, no, it doesn't change the processing time very much.