Forth: additional tests for "combined arithmetic" category #2477
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
IsaacG
reviewed
Sep 20, 2024
IsaacG
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2024
Contributor
Author
|
Added some reviewers to get some traction on the request. |
ErikSchierboom
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2024
BNAndras
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2024
BethanyG
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2024
This will ensure that students are popping numbers off the correct end of the stack (for languages without a builtin Stack type).
glennj
force-pushed
the
forth-arithmetic
branch
from
0efd027 to
09398a2
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
rebased and force pushed to pull in the updates to link checker. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This will ensure that students are popping numbers off the correct end of the stack (for languages without a builtin Stack type).
From: http://forum.exercism.org/t/new-tests-for-forth-exercise-canonical-data/13045