Skip to content

[ERP-2645] Add 'resources' config item #62

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

ScriptSmith
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ScriptSmith ScriptSmith requested a review from NikuPAN October 11, 2024 03:09
@@ -86,9 +89,23 @@ export const getCpuModel = (config, onChange) => () => {

let alertMsg;
if (config?.cpuModel === "E7-8890v4") {
alertMsg = "The E7-8890v4 CPU should only be used for large memory jobs.";
alertMsg =
"The E7-8890v4 CPU should only be used for jobs with more than 512 GB of ram.";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a thought: replacing with by require sounds more appropriate? Also should ram be capitals? It's abbreviation sames as CPU.

inputProps={{
choices: [
["Automatic", "Run the job without specifying resources"],
["Custom", "Specify the resources to use for the job"],
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a thought: Is to use necessary? I think Specify the resources for the job (manually) would be sufficient?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clarified the wording

@ScriptSmith ScriptSmith force-pushed the ERFP-2645-custom-resources branch from 984d710 to 1b99b1a Compare October 11, 2024 05:29
@ScriptSmith ScriptSmith merged commit 43ba860 into main Oct 11, 2024
1 check passed
@ScriptSmith ScriptSmith deleted the ERFP-2645-custom-resources branch October 11, 2024 05:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants