-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Place file-based app artifacts into repo's artifacts dir if used #49863
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
jjonescz
wants to merge
1
commit into
dotnet:main
Choose a base branch
from
jjonescz:sprint-reuse-artifacts
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+126
−34
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I admit I'm not understanding the motivation of this change here. Do we expect users to then be looking at these outputs, or is this just to leverage the existing things that exclude artifact outputs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Leveraging existing default item excludes is one motivation. Another is that all repo artifacts are in one place - so the same motivations should apply as to why artifacts layout exists in the first place, e.g., you can clean all repo artifacts together.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will the artifacts at least be placed under a
runfile
subfolder or some such? Otherwise I worry a bit that the artifacts directory will be polluted.In particular, if a file is not part of a loaded project (e.g. it was not loaded yet or it was deliberately unloaded), the IDE currently will just treat it as a file-based program in many cases, it will do a design time build on it in order to get basic set of references and so on. It could be confusing if the artifacts folder contains many such directories simply due to the way the user was browsing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, that's unfortunate, I haven't realized that.
But I've also noticed that artifacts layout currently seems to assume that projects have unique names. So each project gets a folder like
artifacts/[ProjectName]
. Script's "project name" is the script's file name. That can lead to two scripts sharing the same output location (even more likely given the IDE behavior you described). So I guess we need to create some unique names or directories for scripts.