Move the "Infrastructure as code" section of the Azure Overview article into a separate article

[alistairmatthews]

Summary

Readers are not finding information about how to customize Azure resources from .NET Aspire code. As discussed with @davidfowl, this PR moves the Infrastructure as code section of the Azure Overview article into its own article titled "Customize Azure resources". This change should make this easier for people to locate.

Fixes: #3869

---

Internal previews

Toggle expand/collapse

📄 File	🔗 Preview link
docs/azure/azure-app-configuration-integration.md	.NET Aspire Azure App Configuration integration
docs/azure/configure-aca-environments.md	Configure Azure Container Apps environments
docs/azure/customize-azure-resources.md	Customize Azure resources
docs/azure/integrations-overview.md	docs/azure/integrations-overview
docs/azure/role-assignments.md	Manage Azure role assignments
docs/azureai/azureai-search-document-integration.md	.NET Aspire Azure AI Search integration
docs/messaging/azure-event-hubs-integration.md	.NET Aspire Azure Event Hubs integration
docs/messaging/azure-service-bus-integration.md	.NET Aspire Azure Service Bus integration
docs/messaging/azure-web-pubsub-integration.md	docs/messaging/azure-web-pubsub-integration
docs/security/azure-security-key-vault-integration.md	.NET Aspire Azure Key Vault integration
docs/toc.yml	docs/toc

[IEvangelist]

This looks awesome, and it makes sense. But for future reference, could we please have an issue first—so that a PR is closing an issue, and it gives others to see the plan before it's executed.

[alistairmatthews]

This looks awesome, and it makes sense. But for future reference, could we please have an issue first—so that a PR is closing an issue, and it gives others to see the plan before it's executed.

Will do. Thanks. Shall I open an issue retrospectively for this PR?

[IEvangelist]

This looks awesome, and it makes sense. But for future reference, could we please have an issue first—so that a PR is closing an issue, and it gives others to see the plan before it's executed.

Will do. Thanks. Shall I open an issue retrospectively for this PR?

Yes, that would be great. Thank you

[alistairmatthews]

This looks awesome, and it makes sense. But for future reference, could we please have an issue first—so that a PR is closing an issue, and it gives others to see the plan before it's executed.

Will do. Thanks. Shall I open an issue retrospectively for this PR?

Yes, that would be great. Thank you

Done: #3869