-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10.4k
[blazor] fix multiple calls to OnConnectionDownAsync #62518
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
pavelsavara
wants to merge
1
commit into
dotnet:main
Choose a base branch
from
pavelsavara:blazor_dedup_OnConnectionDownAsync
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+8
−11
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is the right change to fix the metric issue. It's changing an existing behavior of the system that users might be relying on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this event is called twice. That's a bug not a feature
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is causing the 2nd call?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The proper event is
Hub.OnDisconnect()
CircuitHost.OnConnectionDownAsync()
is called fromCircuitHost.DisposeAsync()
regardless if it's connected or not, creating dis-balance.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@javiercn does this make sense or you have another proposal for the fix ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it makes sense, but I think it might not be potentially right to just check
Client.Connected
.I might be wrong, but I suspect there are two paths that we care about.
So, I think that if we check on this, we run the risk of not running the handlers during termination. We might need to mark the host as terminating or something similar to differentiate between the two cases and choose when to run the handlers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I just tested the "close tab" and "navigate to non-interactive page". Both behave as expected, that is, they call the event once.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Terminate it's not being fired in those cases.
unload
to fire.navigate to non-interactive page
https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/blob/main/src/Components/Server/src/CircuitDisconnectMiddleware.cs#L81-L87
https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/blob/main/src/Components/Server/src/Circuits/CircuitRegistry.cs#L391
If we check for the circuit to be connected it won't fire when we want to eagerly terminate the circuit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe we need to call that event from places that call
circuitHost.Client.SetDisconnected()
rather than relying thatcircuitHost.DisposeAsync()
would always call it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also I'm not sure that the new
PauseAndDisposeCircuitHost
is callingSetDisconnected()