Create productContext.md #17
Conversation
|
CodeAnt AI is reviewing your PR. |
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughA new documentation file named Changes
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![korbit-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/322216?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues... but I did find this frog.
.--._.--.
( O O )
/ . . \
.`._______.'.
/( )\
_/ \ \ / / \_
.~ ` \ \ / / ' ~.
{ -. \ V / .- }
_ _`. \ | | | / .'_ _
>_ _} | | | {_ _<
/. - ~ ,_-' .^. `-_, ~ - .\
'-'|/ \|`-`Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hello @dmitriz, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
Hello team, Gemini here with a summary of this pull request. This PR, authored by dmitriz, introduces a new documentation file, cline_docs/productContext.md. The primary goal is to provide a foundational document that explains the core identity, purpose, and philosophy of the aligna project. It specifically details what the project is, why it's important, who it's for, its key design principles, and its long-term vision. A significant concept introduced is the 'Reviewer Layer', outlining the role of external reviewers (human or AI) in ensuring quality and guiding AI agents within the framework.
Highlights
- New Documentation File: A new file,
cline_docs/productContext.md, has been added to the repository. This file serves as a central document for understanding thealignaproject's context. - Project Definition: The document defines
alignaas a meta-framework for AI-native software collaboration, emphasizing embedding contextual knowledge and reducing repetitive prompting. - Introduction of Reviewer Layer: A key concept is introduced: the 'Reviewer Layer'. This involves external agents (human or AI) providing oversight, validation, and feedback to guide and constrain AI activity, ensuring quality and traceability.
- Core Principles and Audience: The document outlines the project's target audience (developers, prompt engineers, reviewers, researchers) and core design principles, such as static context guiding agents, reviewer guidance, and observable logic.
Changelog
- cline_docs/productContext.md
- Created a new documentation file.
- Added content defining the
alignaproject, its purpose, audience, and design principles. - Introduced and described the concept of a 'Reviewer Layer' for AI oversight.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
New docs arrive today,
Context for the AI's way,
Reviewers will guide,
Where the agents stride,
In Markdown, clear display.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨No code suggestions found for the PR. |
codeant-ai
bot
added
the
size:M
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
Review Status: Automated Review Skipped
Dear contributor,
Thank you for your Pull Request. LlamaPReview has analyzed your changes and determined that this PR does not require an automated code review.
Analysis Result:
PR only contains documentation changes (1 files)
Technical Context:
Documentation changes typically include:
- Markdown/RST file updates
- API documentation
- Code comments
- README updates
- Documentation in /docs directory
- License and contribution files
We're continuously improving our PR analysis capabilities. Have thoughts on when and how LlamaPReview should perform automated reviews? Share your insights in our GitHub Discussions.
Best regards,
LlamaPReview Team
Pull Request Feedback 🔍
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
cline_docs/productContext.md (6)
1-9: Refine the main heading for readability.
The heading# productContext.mddirectly references the filename (including extension). Renaming it to a descriptive title, such as# Product Context, aligns with markdown best practices and improves clarity.
11-19: Surround the feature list with blank lines.
Markdown lint (MD032) requires lists to be surrounded by blank lines. Please insert a blank line before the list at lines 17–18:`aligna` addresses this by: + - Providing assistants with structured memory and navigation - Delegating dynamic supervision to **reviewer agents** who can evaluate decisions, correct drift, and ensure adherence to purpose🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
17-17: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
35-39: Correct terminology in Key File Anchors.
Change “Universal entrypoint” to “Universal entry point” for accuracy:- - `README.md`: Universal entrypoint + - `README.md`: Universal entry point🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~36-~36: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...e.** ## Key File Anchors -README.md: Universal entrypoint - `cline_docs/acti...(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
40-46: Add blank line before long-term goal list.
The list at lines 43–46 needs a blank line before it to satisfy markdownlint (MD032):To enable reliable, explainable, tool-agnostic AI workflows grounded in: + - Declarative architecture - Embedded context - Independent review - Promptless cooperation🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
43-43: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
48-54: Insert blank line before reviewer duties list.
Markdownlint flags the duties list at lines 51–53 for missing surrounding blank lines. Add a blank line after line 50:This project invites the integration of **reviewer agents**—entities that: + - Evaluate outputs - Guide assistants back toward goals - Record decisions and interventions for traceability🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
51-51: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
55-59: Surround prototyping steps list with blank lines.
The list at lines 56–58 should be prefaced by a blank line:This layer will be prototyped via: + - Explicit reviewer prompts - Human-in-the-loop validation - Feedback-driven context updates🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
56-56: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
cline_docs/productContext.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
cline_docs/productContext.md
[uncategorized] ~36-~36: Loose punctuation mark.
Context: ...e.** ## Key File Anchors - README.md: Universal entrypoint - `cline_docs/acti...
(UNLIKELY_OPENING_PUNCTUATION)
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)
cline_docs/productContext.md
17-17: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
43-43: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
51-51: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
56-56: Lists should be surrounded by blank lines
null
(MD032, blanks-around-lists)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cline_docs/productContext.md (2)
21-25: Audience section is clear and well-formatted.
The bullet list of intended users is concise, follows markdown conventions, and is properly surrounded by blank lines. No changes needed.
27-33: Design principles section is consistent.
The declarative design points use a properly spaced bullet list, reinforcing readability and alignment with project goals.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces productContext.md, a crucial document for understanding the aligna project. The document is well-structured, clearly written, and effectively conveys the project's purpose, target audience, design principles, and long-term vision, including the innovative "reviewer layer" concept. The content is comprehensive and provides excellent context for anyone new to the project or looking to understand its core philosophy.
I've made a few suggestions aimed at further enhancing clarity and usability, particularly around defining a key design principle, elaborating on a long-term goal, and improving navigation through linked documents.
Overall, this is a valuable addition to the project's documentation.
Summary of Findings
- Clarity of 'Bridge Adapters' Design Principle: The design principle 'Bridge adapters connect agents to context' could benefit from a brief parenthetical explanation to clarify the role and nature of these adapters, as they are a key architectural component mentioned only once.
- Enhanced Navigability for Key File Anchors: The 'Key File Anchors' section lists important documents. Converting these file paths into clickable Markdown links would significantly improve the document's usability and allow readers to navigate to related contexts more easily.
- Elaboration on 'Promptless Cooperation' Goal: The long-term goal of 'Promptless cooperation' is a strong and intriguing concept. Adding a brief explanatory note could further highlight its significance and provide a clearer vision of what this entails.
- Terminology Consistency (Low Severity - Not commented due to settings): There's a slight variation in terms like "external reviewers" (line 9) and "reviewer agents" (lines 18, 50). While understandable, consistently using a primary term (e.g., "reviewer agents") and clarifying its scope (human or AI, external) when first introduced or when necessary could enhance precision. This is a minor point and was not raised as a formal comment due to review settings.
Merge Readiness
This pull request adds valuable product context documentation. The new productContext.md file is well-written and informative. I've identified a few areas where clarity and usability could be further enhanced, particularly concerning a design principle, a long-term goal, and internal document navigation. Addressing these medium-severity suggestions would strengthen the document. Therefore, I recommend that these changes be considered before merging. As an AI reviewer, I am not authorized to approve pull requests.
|
|
||
| - **Static context guides active agents.** | ||
| - **Reviewers guide the agents.** | ||
| - **Bridge adapters connect agents to context.** |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The design principle "Bridge adapters connect agents to context." is introduced here. While concise, it might leave readers wondering about the nature or function of these "bridge adapters," as they aren't elaborated upon elsewhere in this document.
Could we consider adding a brief parenthetical explanation to clarify their role? This would help readers better grasp this aspect of the system's architecture.
| - **Bridge adapters connect agents to context.** | |
| - **Bridge adapters (e.g., dedicated modules or interfaces facilitating data exchange) connect agents to context.** |
| - `README.md`: Universal entrypoint | ||
| - `cline_docs/activeContext.md`: Current task state (bridge for Cline) | ||
| - `cline_docs/productContext.md`: Project identity and review philosophy |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In the "Key File Anchors" section, listing the file paths is helpful. To further improve navigability and user experience, could we make these Markdown links? This would allow readers to directly jump to these important documents from here.
(Please adjust paths if the assumed relative locations are incorrect. README.md is assumed to be in the parent directory, and activeContext.md in the current cline_docs directory.)
| - `README.md`: Universal entrypoint | |
| - `cline_docs/activeContext.md`: Current task state (bridge for Cline) | |
| - `cline_docs/productContext.md`: Project identity and review philosophy | |
| - [`README.md`](../README.md): Universal entrypoint | |
| - [`cline_docs/activeContext.md`](activeContext.md): Current task state (bridge for Cline) | |
| - [`cline_docs/productContext.md`](productContext.md): Project identity and review philosophy |
| - Declarative architecture | ||
| - Embedded context | ||
| - Independent review | ||
| - Promptless cooperation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The long-term goal of "Promptless cooperation" is quite compelling and a key differentiator. To make its significance even clearer to the reader, would it be beneficial to add a short explanatory phrase? This could help articulate the vision behind this ambitious goal more vividly.
| - Promptless cooperation | |
| - Promptless cooperation (i.e., AI components collaborating effectively based on shared context and goals, minimizing reliance on explicit, turn-by-turn prompting) |
|
Looks good to me! |
|
CodeAnt AI finished reviewing your PR. |
User description
User description
This pull request introduces a new documentation file,
cline_docs/productContext.md, which provides a comprehensive overview of thealignaproject, its purpose, target audience, design principles, and long-term goals. The document also introduces the concept of a "reviewer layer" for oversight and quality control in AI workflows.Documentation Updates:
productContext.mdfile describesalignaas a meta-framework for AI-native software collaboration, focusing on embedding contextual knowledge and introducing reviewer agents for quality assurance.README.mdand other context-specific documentation, as entry points for understanding the project.PR Type
Documentation
Description
Adds comprehensive product context documentation for
alignaDetails project purpose, target audience, and design principles
Introduces the reviewer layer concept for quality oversight
Outlines key file anchors and long-term project goals
Changes walkthrough 📝
productContext.md
Add detailed product context and reviewer layer documentationcline_docs/productContext.md
aligna's purpose andphilosophy
control
CodeAnt-AI Description
productContext.mddocumentation file that provides a comprehensive overview of thealignaproject, including its purpose, design principles, and intended audience.This PR adds foundational documentation to clarify the project's goals, philosophy, and unique approach to quality assurance through reviewer agents. It serves as a key reference for contributors, users, and researchers interested in the alignment and oversight of AI-driven systems.
Changes walkthrough
productContext.md
Introduce comprehensive product context and reviewer layerdocumentation
cline_docs/productContext.md
philosophy of the
alignaproject.control in AI workflows.
long-term goals.
implementation strategies.
💡 Usage Guide
Checking Your Pull Request
Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.
Talking to CodeAnt AI
Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:
This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.
Retrigger review
Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:
Check Your Repository Health
To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.