Skip to content

it is IFL1 not IFL2 #21010

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 17, 2025
Merged

it is IFL1 not IFL2 #21010

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 17, 2025

Conversation

WalterBright
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@WalterBright WalterBright added Compiler:Backend glue code, optimizer, code generation Arch:Aarch64 Issues specific to Arm 64 labels Mar 17, 2025
@dlang-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request, @WalterBright!

Bugzilla references

Your PR doesn't reference any Bugzilla issue.

If your PR contains non-trivial changes, please reference a Bugzilla issue or create a manual changelog.

Testing this PR locally

If you don't have a local development environment setup, you can use Digger to test this PR:

dub run digger -- build "master + dmd#21010"

Copy link
Contributor

@thewilsonator thewilsonator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise looks good

@thewilsonator
Copy link
Contributor

Assertion failed: j == 61440 && k == 3840, file runnable\exe1.c, line 1449

Is that an expected failure?

@WalterBright
Copy link
Member Author

I don't know why it is failing there, but it's not due to this PR.

@WalterBright WalterBright merged commit 0312e82 into dlang:master Mar 17, 2025
41 of 42 checks passed
@WalterBright WalterBright deleted the notu8 branch March 17, 2025 16:50
@pbackus
Copy link
Contributor

pbackus commented Mar 22, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Arch:Aarch64 Issues specific to Arm 64 Compiler:Backend glue code, optimizer, code generation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants