Skip to content

refactor: using eslint-config-neon on mainlib #10876

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 36 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Qjuh
Copy link
Member

@Qjuh Qjuh commented May 2, 2025

Please describe the changes this PR makes and why it should be merged:

Removes the old-style .eslintrc.json and the custom configuration for mainlib discord.js to instead use the global eslint.config.js using eslint-config-neon style with only few of our customizations.

This is semver minor because it moved the anonymous findName function to the named findName() in Util.js and we export all methods from that file.

Status and versioning classification:

  • Code changes have been tested against the Discord API, or there are no code changes
  • I know how to update typings and have done so, or typings don't need updating
  • This PR changes the library's interface (methods or parameters added)

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 2, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
discord-js ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 13, 2025 9:50am
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
discord-js-guide ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview May 13, 2025 9:50am

@Qjuh Qjuh marked this pull request as ready for review May 3, 2025 14:45
@Qjuh Qjuh requested review from a team and iCrawl as code owners May 3, 2025 14:45
@Qjuh Qjuh requested review from vladfrangu, kyranet and SpaceEEC May 3, 2025 14:45
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Review in Progress in discord.js May 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Review in Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants