Skip to content

refactor(Client): Remove with_expiration query parameter #10800

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 6, 2025

Conversation

Jiralite
Copy link
Member

Please describe the changes this PR makes and why it should be merged:

Status and versioning classification:

  • Code changes have been tested against the Discord API, or there are no code changes
  • I know how to update typings and have done so, or typings don't need updating

Copy link

vercel bot commented Mar 14, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
discord-js ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 6, 2025 2:20pm
discord-js-guide ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback May 6, 2025 2:20pm

@Jiralite Jiralite added this to the discord.js 15.0.0 milestone Mar 14, 2025
@Jiralite Jiralite marked this pull request as ready for review May 6, 2025 08:58
@Jiralite Jiralite requested a review from a team as a code owner May 6, 2025 08:58
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Review Approved in discord.js May 6, 2025
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 432cdbe into main May 6, 2025
8 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the refactor/with-expiration-removal branch May 6, 2025 14:24
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Review Approved to Done in discord.js May 6, 2025
Jiralite added a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
refactor(Client): remove `with_expiration`

Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants