Skip to content

unify Combine and CombineTypes #2651

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 30 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
Show all changes
30 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
b66de13
wip add the functionality of CombineTypes to Combine
winitzki Mar 13, 2025
e07a39e
wip
winitzki Mar 13, 2025
068d623
pretty-print //\\ as /\ now globlly
winitzki Mar 13, 2025
bb59a38
typechecking of record type /\ record type
winitzki Mar 13, 2025
f7c03e3
undo the formatting change because tests fail
winitzki Mar 14, 2025
d21abae
implement /\ reduction for record types
winitzki Mar 14, 2025
be4ea39
fix isNormalized
winitzki Mar 14, 2025
11a7b3c
add comment
winitzki Mar 17, 2025
8050d24
remove wrong import
winitzki Mar 17, 2025
8fe9623
refactor code for clarity
winitzki Mar 20, 2025
e7b55f0
Merge branch 'main' into feature/unify-Combine-and-CombineTypes
winitzki May 5, 2025
20dfebd
bump ci
winitzki May 7, 2025
5933b6a
bump ci
winitzki May 7, 2025
79d0da8
Merge branch 'main' into feature/unify-Combine-and-CombineTypes
winitzki May 14, 2025
189d572
bump ci
winitzki May 15, 2025
0bcc84d
bump ci
winitzki May 16, 2025
0ecadb1
bump ci
winitzki May 16, 2025
400549e
bump ci
winitzki May 17, 2025
43a8741
bump ci
winitzki May 17, 2025
5f51a3f
bump ci
winitzki May 18, 2025
7a5bca8
Merge branch 'main' into feature/unify-Combine-and-CombineTypes
winitzki Jun 18, 2025
7864ec9
bump ci
winitzki Jun 19, 2025
d7b782c
refactor to use combineTypesCheckingForFieldCollisions outside of loo…
winitzki Jun 19, 2025
53a5a3d
minor rewrite
winitzki Jun 19, 2025
df0330c
Add a better error message for the case of /\ on record terms or types
winitzki Jun 19, 2025
aa6fd30
implement better error messages
winitzki Jun 20, 2025
c942a3d
wip adding unit tests for CombineTypes feature
winitzki Jun 20, 2025
87845fa
add unit tests for new error messages
winitzki Jun 20, 2025
9557e57
better error messages and more unit tests
winitzki Jun 21, 2025
5cfc83c
Merge branch 'main' into feature/unify-Combine-and-CombineTypes
winitzki Jul 1, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions dhall/src/Dhall/Eval.hs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -318,6 +318,12 @@ vCombine mk t u =
t'
(VRecordLit m, VRecordLit m') ->
VRecordLit (Map.unionWith (vCombine Nothing) m m')
(VRecord m, u') | null m ->
u'
(t', VRecord m) | null m ->
t'
(VRecord m, VRecord m') ->
VRecord (Map.unionWith (vCombine Nothing) m m')
(t', u') ->
VCombine mk t' u'

Expand Down
16 changes: 12 additions & 4 deletions dhall/src/Dhall/Normalize.hs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -548,15 +548,20 @@ normalizeWithM ctx e0 = loop (Syntax.denote e0)
kts' = traverse (traverse loop) kts
Combine cs mk x y -> decide <$> loop x <*> loop y
where
mergeFields (RecordField _ expr _ _) (RecordField _ expr' _ _) =
Syntax.makeRecordField $ decide expr expr'
decide (RecordLit m) r | Data.Foldable.null m =
r
decide l (RecordLit n) | Data.Foldable.null n =
l
decide (RecordLit m) (RecordLit n) =
RecordLit (Dhall.Map.unionWith f m n)
where
f (RecordField _ expr _ _) (RecordField _ expr' _ _) =
Syntax.makeRecordField $ decide expr expr'
RecordLit (Dhall.Map.unionWith mergeFields m n)
decide (Record m) r | Data.Foldable.null m =
r
decide l (Record n) | Data.Foldable.null n =
l
decide (Record m) (Record n) =
Record (Dhall.Map.unionWith mergeFields m n)
decide l r =
Combine cs mk l r
CombineTypes cs x y -> decide <$> loop x <*> loop y
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -949,6 +954,9 @@ isNormalized e0 = loop (Syntax.denote e0)
decide (RecordLit m) _ | Data.Foldable.null m = False
decide _ (RecordLit n) | Data.Foldable.null n = False
decide (RecordLit _) (RecordLit _) = False
decide (Record m) _ | Data.Foldable.null m = False
decide _ (Record n) | Data.Foldable.null n = False
decide (Record _) (Record _) = False
decide _ _ = True
CombineTypes _ x y -> loop x && loop y && decide x y
where
Expand Down
49 changes: 40 additions & 9 deletions dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -801,15 +801,24 @@
Combine _ mk l r -> do
_L' <- loop ctx l

let l'' = quote names (eval values l)
let l' = eval values l

let l'' = quote names l'

_R' <- loop ctx r

let r'' = quote names (eval values r)
let r' = eval values r

xLs' <- case _L' of
VRecord xLs' ->
return xLs'
let r'' = quote names r'

-- The `Combine` operator should now work on record terms and also on record types.
-- If both sides are record terms, we set leftTypeOrRecord and rightTypeOrRecord to (Left record_fields).
-- If both sides are record types, we set both of them to (Right (Type, record_fields)).
-- Then we match the pair (leftTypeOrRecord, rightTypeOrRecord) to make sure we catch errors.
leftTypeOrRecord <- case (_L', l') of
(VRecord xLs', _) -> return (Left xLs')

(VConst cL, VRecord xLs') -> return (Right (cL, xLs'))

_ -> do
let _L'' = quote names _L'
Expand All @@ -818,9 +827,12 @@
Nothing -> die (MustCombineARecord '∧' l'' _L'')
Just t -> die (InvalidDuplicateField t l _L'')

xRs' <- case _R' of
VRecord xRs' ->
return xRs'
-- Make sure both are on the Left (both record values) or on the Right (both record types).
rightTypeOrRecord <- case (leftTypeOrRecord, _R', r') of
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be better to first construct leftTypeOrRecord, then rightTypeOfRecord, and do the check that they are both Left or both Right afterwards in a separate step.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be better to first construct leftTypeOrRecord, then rightTypeOfRecord, and do the check that they are both Left or both Right afterwards in a separate step.

I'm not sure I understand your comment. It appears to me that my code already does what you say: it first constructs leftTypeOrRecord, then rightTypeOfRecord, and then checks that they are both Left or both Right in a separate expression.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mmhat mmhat Mar 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What I mean is that you match on leftTypeOrRecord when you construct rightTypeOrRecord.
I think something like the following results in better error messages:

let isTypeOrRecord t = do
        _T <- loop ctx t

        let t' = eval values t
            
        case (_T, t') of
                (VRecord xs, _) -> return (Left xs)

                (VConst _T', VRecord xs) -> return (Right (_T', xs))

                _ -> do
                    let _T'' = quote names _T'

                    case mk of
                        Nothing -> die (MustCombineARecord '' l'' _T'')
                        Just k  -> die (InvalidDuplicateField k t _T'')

leftTypeOrRecord <- isTypeOrRecord l
rightTypeOrRecord <- isTypeOrRecord r

case (leftTypeOrRecord, rightTypeOrRecord)
    (Left ..., Left ...) -> ...
    (Right ..., Right ...) -> ...
    (Left ..., Right ...) -> die (TriedToCombineLitWithType ...)
    (Right ..., Left ...) -> die (TriedToCombineTypeWithLit ...)

(Left _, VRecord xRs', _) ->
return (Left xRs')

(Right _, VConst cR, VRecord xRs') -> return (Right (cR, xRs'))

_ -> do
let _R'' = quote names _R'
Expand All @@ -845,7 +857,26 @@

return (VRecord xTs)

combineTypes [] xLs' xRs'
let combineTypesCheck xs xLs₀' xRs₀' = do
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we can pull this out of look and use it in both the Combine and CombineTypes cases?
Also, can we rename this to something more meaningful like checkForFieldCollisions?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will do.

let combine x (VRecord xLs₁') (VRecord xRs₁') =
combineTypesCheck (x : xs) xLs₁' xRs₁'

combine x _ _ =
die (FieldTypeCollision (NonEmpty.reverse (x :| xs)))

let mL = Dhall.Map.toMap xLs₀'
let mR = Dhall.Map.toMap xRs₀'

Foldable.sequence_ (Data.Map.intersectionWithKey combine mL mR)

case (leftTypeOrRecord, rightTypeOrRecord) of

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / ubuntu-latest - stack.ghc-9.8.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / ubuntu-latest - stack.ghc-9.8.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / ubuntu-latest - stack.ghc-9.4.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / ubuntu-latest - stack.ghc-9.4.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / ubuntu-latest - stack.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / ubuntu-latest - stack.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / ubuntu-latest - stack.ghc-9.2.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / ubuntu-latest - stack.ghc-9.2.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / ubuntu-latest - stack.ghc-8.10.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / ubuntu-latest - stack.ghc-8.10.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / ubuntu-latest - stack.ghc-8.10.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / macOS-latest - stack.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / macOS-latest - stack.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / windows-latest - stack.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / macos-13 - stack.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive

Check warning on line 872 in dhall/src/Dhall/TypeCheck.hs

View workflow job for this annotation

GitHub Actions / macos-13 - stack.yaml

Pattern match(es) are non-exhaustive
(Left xLs', Left xRs') -> do
combineTypes [] xLs' xRs'
(Right (cL, xLs'), Right (cR, xRs')) -> do
let c = max cL cR
combineTypesCheck [] xLs' xRs'
return (VConst c)


CombineTypes _ l r -> do
_L' <- loop ctx l
Expand Down
Loading