Skip to content

Conversation

@sundarshankar89
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes

What does this PR do?

Adds documentation about profilers

  • Source Pre-requisites
  • Configuration Process
  • Execution Process

Relevant implementation details

image Pre-req image

Caveats/things to watch out for when reviewing:

Linked issues

Resolves #..

Functionality

  • added relevant user documentation
  • added new CLI command
  • modified existing command: databricks labs lakebridge ...
  • ... +add your own

Tests

  • manually tested
  • added unit tests
  • added integration tests

@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 16, 2025 06:12
@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 self-assigned this Oct 16, 2025
@sundarshankar89 sundarshankar89 added do-not-merge documentation Improvements or additions to documentation feat/profiler Issues related to profilers labels Oct 16, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 16, 2025

✅ 46/46 passed, 7 flaky, 3m4s total

Flaky tests:

  • 🤪 test_validate_non_empty_tables (17ms)
  • 🤪 test_transpiles_informatica_to_sparksql_non_interactive[False] (13.274s)
  • 🤪 test_transpile_teradata_sql_non_interactive[False] (16.005s)
  • 🤪 test_transpile_teradata_sql (16.851s)
  • 🤪 test_transpile_teradata_sql_non_interactive[True] (7.386s)
  • 🤪 test_transpiles_informatica_to_sparksql_non_interactive[True] (8.209s)
  • 🤪 test_transpiles_informatica_to_sparksql (9.289s)

Running from acceptance #2784

@gueniai
Copy link
Collaborator

gueniai commented Oct 19, 2025

We need to add docs for deploying the local dashboard as well.

The section of "The profiler will" should be more prominent, customers will have questions regarding runtimes, impact to their system, and probably some details about the output.

@sundarshankar89
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We need to add docs for deploying the local dashboard as well.

The section of "The profiler will" should be more prominent, customers will have questions regarding runtimes, impact to their system, and probably some details about the output.

That portion is still in development, can we iterate on that once @goodwillpunning is finished withat that?

@gueniai
Copy link
Collaborator

gueniai commented Oct 22, 2025

Yes, of course, but that will be done before we release the docs, this was just a note so that we don't forget to add functionality too before merging this branch

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 28, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 64.87%. Comparing base (7be6421) to head (f02adb7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2098   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   64.87%   64.87%           
=======================================
  Files          96       96           
  Lines        7895     7895           
  Branches      821      821           
=======================================
  Hits         5122     5122           
  Misses       2593     2593           
  Partials      180      180           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

do-not-merge documentation Improvements or additions to documentation feat/profiler Issues related to profilers

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants