Skip to content

feat(mobile-messaging): add callback parameter for Mobile Messaging S… #4930

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ivanbilobrk
Copy link

Mobile Messaging, new init callback parameter.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @ivanbilobrk, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request introduces a new callback parameter to the init method of the MobileMessaging class in the @awesome-cordova-plugins/plugins/mobile-messaging module. This callback function will be executed after the successful initialization of the Mobile Messaging SDK. The goal is to provide a mechanism for developers to execute code immediately after the SDK is ready, and before the registrationUpdated event is fired.

Highlights

  • Feature Addition: A new callback parameter is added to the init method of the MobileMessaging class.
  • Initialization Handling: The new callback is intended to be called after the successful start of Mobile Messaging SDK initialization.

Changelog

  • src/@awesome-cordova-plugins/plugins/mobile-messaging/index.ts
    • Added a callback parameter to the init method.
    • Updated the documentation to reflect the new callback parameter and its purpose.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A callback's gentle call,
SDK starts, standing tall,
Then your code takes flight,
In the messaging light,
Ready now, to give your all.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request introduces a callback parameter for the Mobile Messaging SDK initialization. This allows developers to execute code after the SDK has successfully started. The addition of this callback enhances the flexibility of the SDK and allows for more complex initialization scenarios. The code change itself is small and straightforward.

Merge Readiness

The code change is a straightforward addition of a callback parameter. Given the absence of any identified issues, the pull request appears ready for merging. However, as I am unable to directly approve the pull request, it is recommended that others review and approve this code before merging.

Comment on lines 332 to 334
* @param onInitError
* @param {Function} callback. Called after successful start of Mobile Messaging SDK initialization. Register for registrationUpdated event to know when it's ready to be used.
* @param {Function} onInitError. Error callback

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

Consider reordering the parameters to follow the convention of placing optional parameters at the end. This would make the API more consistent with common JavaScript practices. Also, the JSDoc comment for the callback parameter is placed before the @param onInitError comment, which is unconventional. It would be better to place it after the @param config comment and before the @param onInitError comment to maintain consistency with the order of parameters in the function signature.

Suggested change
* @param onInitError
* @param {Function} callback. Called after successful start of Mobile Messaging SDK initialization. Register for registrationUpdated event to know when it's ready to be used.
* @param {Function} onInitError. Error callback
* @param config. Configuration for Mobile Messaging
* @param config
* @param {Function} callback. Called after successful start of Mobile Messaging SDK initialization. Register for registrationUpdated event to know when it's ready to be used.
* @param {Function} onInitError. Error callback

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants