Skip to content

docs: update v8 snapshot guide to describe troubleshooting when dependencies are missing #31680

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

ryanthemanuel
Copy link
Collaborator

Additional details

Update v8 snapshot guide to describe troubleshooting when dependencies are missing

Steps to test

How has the user experience changed?

PR Tasks

Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the v8 snapshot guide to include troubleshooting instructions for missing dependencies in snapshots.

  • Adds a new "Missing Dependency" section with background information on snapshot dependencies.
  • Provides step-by-step guidance on how to handle missing dependency errors.

@jennifer-shehane jennifer-shehane changed the title chore: update v8 snapshot guide to describe troubleshooting when dependencies are missing docs: update v8 snapshot guide to describe troubleshooting when dependencies are missing May 12, 2025
ryanthemanuel and others added 2 commits May 12, 2025 16:31
Co-authored-by: Bill Glesias <bglesias@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Bill Glesias <bglesias@gmail.com>
@ryanthemanuel ryanthemanuel merged commit 29050aa into develop May 13, 2025
83 of 89 checks passed
@ryanthemanuel ryanthemanuel deleted the ryanm/chore/update-v8-snapshot-readme-dependencies branch May 13, 2025 13:01
@ryanthemanuel ryanthemanuel self-assigned this May 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants