Skip to content

Add more entries to ToTuple function and add elisp code #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2024

Conversation

Yaraslaut
Copy link
Member

Added elisp code that can generate entries inside ToTuple function

@Yaraslaut Yaraslaut force-pushed the improvement/toTuple_fill branch from 076aa7b to a973d99 Compare October 14, 2024 13:26

/**

elisp functions to fill the ToTuple function
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ugh, elisp? 🗡️

Alright, ultimatively (in the long run), at lesat for the Lightweight SQL project, I probably need something way beyond 100. But not now for sure. I was considering something like a top and bottom marker in that file, and then a script the inject this unpleasant code fragment fest of repetition in between the two markers (discarding what used to be within them before). Hmm... But that's up for a future idea, I think :)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This only becomes relevant when we eventually start using Lightweight at the company. So we have some time :)

Copy link
Member

@christianparpart christianparpart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you :)

@christianparpart christianparpart merged commit c6b5488 into master Oct 14, 2024
4 checks passed
@christianparpart christianparpart deleted the improvement/toTuple_fill branch January 21, 2025 21:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants