Skip to content

fix: Merge failures occurring when using different strategies (overwrite with compare, merge base, merge compare) #1917

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 9, 2025

Conversation

aman19K
Copy link
Contributor

@aman19K aman19K commented May 9, 2025

No description provided.

…ite with compare, merge base, merge compare)
sunil-lakshman
sunil-lakshman previously approved these changes May 9, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sunil-lakshman sunil-lakshman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@aman19K aman19K changed the base branch from main to staging May 9, 2025 07:40
@aman19K aman19K dismissed sunil-lakshman’s stale review May 9, 2025 07:40

The base branch was changed.

sunil-lakshman
sunil-lakshman previously approved these changes May 9, 2025
cs-raj
cs-raj previously approved these changes May 9, 2025
@aman19K aman19K marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2025 10:50
@aman19K aman19K requested a review from a team as a code owner May 9, 2025 10:50
shafeeqd959
shafeeqd959 previously approved these changes May 9, 2025
@aman19K aman19K dismissed stale reviews from shafeeqd959, cs-raj, and sunil-lakshman via 409864c May 9, 2025 11:10
@aman19K aman19K requested a review from vkalta May 9, 2025 11:11
@aman19K aman19K merged commit f6509b4 into staging May 9, 2025
10 checks passed
@aman19K aman19K deleted the hotfix/DX-2957-branches-merge branch May 9, 2025 11:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants