Skip to content

docs: fix formatting of top level example. #1161

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

docs: fix formatting of top level example. #1161

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 19, 2025

Conversation

gpeacock
Copy link
Collaborator

Changes in this pull request

Docs on crates.io had invalid formatting.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.29%. Comparing base (47df42e) to head (107adca).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1161      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.29%   79.29%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         147      147              
  Lines       40701    40701              
==========================================
- Hits        32274    32273       -1     
- Misses       8427     8428       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@gpeacock gpeacock requested a review from crandmck June 19, 2025 14:59
@gpeacock gpeacock changed the title doc: fix formatting of top level example. docs: fix formatting of top level example. Jun 19, 2025
@gpeacock gpeacock merged commit 2fc9caf into main Jun 19, 2025
38 of 39 checks passed
@gpeacock gpeacock deleted the gpeacock/doc_fix branch June 19, 2025 20:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants