Skip to content

libpod: use pasta Setup() over Setup2() #24417

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

Luap99
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 commented Oct 30, 2024

Setup2() calls Setup() so they are both the same thing, the idea was to keep Setup2() around in c/common for a bit to avoid breaking changes during our regular vendoring. Now just use Setup() so we can get rid of Setup2() in c/common.

containers/common@a7415c3

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

None

Setup2() calls Setup() so they are both the same thing, the idea was to
keep Setup2() around in c/common for a bit to avoid breaking changes
during our regular vendoring. Now just use Setup() so we can get rid of
Setup2() in c/common.

containers/common@a7415c3

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 30, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 30, 2024
Luap99 added a commit to Luap99/common that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
This was just added as alias to allow vendoring without having to fix
all callers at the same time.

These are the PRs that updat the callers:
containers/podman#24417
containers/buildah#5724

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
Luap99 added a commit to Luap99/common that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
This was just added as alias to allow vendoring without having to fix
all callers at the same time.

These are the PRs that update the callers:
containers/podman#24417
containers/buildah#5724

Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
@Luap99 Luap99 added the No New Tests Allow PR to proceed without adding regression tests label Oct 30, 2024
@mheon
Copy link
Member

mheon commented Oct 30, 2024

LGTM

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Oct 30, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 30, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit c8238a9 into containers:main Oct 30, 2024
77 checks passed
@Luap99 Luap99 deleted the pasta2 branch October 30, 2024 14:42
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Jan 29, 2025
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 29, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. No New Tests Allow PR to proceed without adding regression tests release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants