Skip to content

May 2025 Cabal notes #392

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

TomSweeneyRedHat
Copy link
Member

This commit contains the note from the Podman Community Cabal meeting that was held on Tuesday, May 6, 2025.

This commit contains the note from the Podman Community Cabal meeting
that was held on Tuesday, May 6, 2025.

Signed-off-by: tomsweeneyredhat <tsweeney@redhat.com>
Thank you Jan
```

### Raw Google Meet Transcript
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you actually want to publish that? I just took a brief look and there are ton of incorrect things in there. If we publish the recording is there a need to publish this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not clear about what you're objecting to. The Google Meet transcript is the chat that went on during the meeting and doesn't get captured in the transcript. We've always posted the meeting notes based on what I heard and then wrote, as well as the full transcript, since we started capturing it several months or more ago.

If there are inaccuracies in what I recorded in the notes, I'm happy to change them.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not talking about the notes you took. I am talking about this automatic transcript below. It is full of errors and I have a really hard time even making sense of a lot things it writes so I (personally) don't consider in a state that should be published. Like there are a ton of sentences I just cannot make sense of and things like "portman" instead of podman.

If you have been doing this for months I wouldn't know because I don't review these PRs normally and just looked at it because I looked at another podman.io PR.

Anyway I won't block over that but I don't understand the value that this is adding.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FWIW, we've been adding the "raw" notes for several months now, if not over a year. Despite the bad note-taking they almost always have, there are some people who will reference them against the video to see what was said. I know I have personally to verify a particular comment that I thought I heard while cleaning up the notes.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Feel free to merge as usual then

@TomSweeneyRedHat TomSweeneyRedHat merged commit cf0b00c into containers:main May 12, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants