Skip to content

Add missing backslash jupyter build command in documentation #345

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

mcbarton
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Please include a summary of changes, motivation and context for this PR.

Fixes # (issue)

In #343 I missed a backslash in 2 locations for the jupyter build command. This PR fixes that.

Type of change

Please tick all options which are relevant.

  • Bug fix
  • New feature
  • Added/removed dependencies
  • Required documentation updates

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.78%. Comparing base (b982334) to head (d8c0683).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #345   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.78%   81.78%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines         950      950           
  Branches       87       87           
=======================================
  Hits          777      777           
  Misses        173      173           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mcbarton mcbarton requested a review from anutosh491 June 11, 2025 08:10
@anutosh491 anutosh491 merged commit 66f6182 into compiler-research:main Jun 11, 2025
37 of 39 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants