Skip to content

fix(question): strict type with pydantic for questions #1467

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

build: use pydantic >=1.10

148babc
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Closed

fix(question): strict type with pydantic for questions #1467

build: use pydantic >=1.10
148babc
Select commit
Loading
Failed to load commit list.
Codecov / codecov/project succeeded May 30, 2025 in 0s

97.85% (target 97.00%)

View this Pull Request on Codecov

97.85% (target 97.00%)

Details

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.85%. Comparing base (a3919c9) to head (148babc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           refactors    #1467      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      97.82%   97.85%   +0.02%     
=============================================
  Files             57       58       +1     
  Lines           2618     2652      +34     
=============================================
+ Hits            2561     2595      +34     
  Misses            57       57              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.