Status L2 Linea test deployment

[2-towns]

No description provided.

[emizzle]

Hmm, maybe we should commit these files so we can re-deploy on Linea if needed? IOW, maybe we should take this out of draft? Thoughts?

[emizzle]

Overall I think this looks good. However, is there a particular reason for wanting to commit the zkey and r1cs? These are both very large files (and could get a lot larger).

[2-towns]

Overall I think this looks good. However, is there a particular reason for wanting to commit the zkey and r1cs? These are both very large files (and could get a lot larger).

There is no specific reason, I wasn't sure the importance to add them into git or not.

[2-towns]

Overall I think this looks good. However, is there a particular reason for wanting to commit the zkey and r1cs? These are both very large files (and could get a lot larger).

Those files are committed for other networks, like testnet for example.

[emizzle]

Those files are committed for other networks, like testnet for example.

Ah yes, I remember we moved them from nim-codex to codex-contracts-eth. But after the circuit downloader was put in, do we need to keep these files in codex-contracts-eth? @dryajov ?

[veaceslavdoina]

Those files are committed for other networks, like testnet for example.

Ah yes, I remember we moved them from nim-codex to codex-contracts-eth. But after the circuit downloader was put in, do we need to keep these files in codex-contracts-eth? @dryajov ?

@emizzle, I would assume these files (zkey and r1cs) are similar to the existing network (codex_testnet / codex_devnet) from my PR #135.

I was added them following an example for codexdisttestnetwork added by @AuHau in #89, @benbierens in #96 / #178, and @gmega in #121.

@AuHau was first, let's ask him for more details - why do we need zkey and r1cs if we have them already on CDN?