Skip to content

🔖 v1.0.0 #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 13, 2025
Merged

🔖 v1.0.0 #3

merged 3 commits into from
Jun 13, 2025

Conversation

NatoBoram
Copy link
Collaborator

@NatoBoram NatoBoram commented Jun 13, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the changelog to include a new release section and improved version tracking links.
    • Added a TypeScript directive comment in the usage example to clarify type checking behavior.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changelog was updated to document a new release, moving specific entries from the unreleased section to a dated release section, and adding version links. The README received a TypeScript directive comment to suppress a type error in a usage example, with no other modifications.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CHANGELOG.md Moved entries for Lang enum and langs object to a new [1.0.0] section; added version links.
README.md Added // @ts-expect-error above a usage example to suppress a TypeScript type error.

Poem

🎉
A changelog now shines with a date so precise,
And README’s example is handled quite nice.
TypeScript’s complaints are hushed with a line,
While versioning links keep the history fine.
With every small tweak, the docs grow more bright—
Onward to 1.0.0, everything’s right!

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
  • Create PR with Unit Tests
  • Commit Unit Tests in branch release/v1.0.0
  • Post Copyable Unit Tests in Comment
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@NatoBoram NatoBoram self-assigned this Jun 13, 2025
@NatoBoram NatoBoram marked this pull request as ready for review June 13, 2025 19:50
coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jun 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

19-20: Include TypeScript error code in suppression comment

The // @ts-expect-error directive properly suppresses the type mismatch. To aid future maintainers, append the specific TS error code (e.g., // @ts-expect-error TS2345) in the comment.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ae905f1 and 23536a0.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • CHANGELOG.md (2 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
CHANGELOG.md (2)

21-27: Confirm release date accuracy

Ensure the header date 2025-06-13 reflects the actual publication date of v1.0.0.

37-38: Verify changelog comparison links

Double-check that [Unreleased] compares v1.0.0...HEAD and [1.0.0] points to the correct release tag URL.

@NatoBoram NatoBoram added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 13, 2025
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2025
@NatoBoram
🔖 v1.0.0 (#3)
ef84899 
* 🔖 v1.0.0

* 📝 Update changelog to v1.0.0

* 📝 Add `@ts-expect-error` to usage instructions
Merged via the queue into main with commit ef84899 Jun 13, 2025
3 checks passed
@NatoBoram NatoBoram deleted the release/v1.0.0 branch June 13, 2025 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes

Assignees

@NatoBoram NatoBoram

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@NatoBoram