Skip to content

Bugfix: deprecated params & unused datasource from lookup #41

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

Benbentwo
Copy link
Contributor

@Benbentwo Benbentwo commented Jun 16, 2025

what

  • Bugfix:
    • deprecated parameters in module
    • Unused datasource

why

  • Bugfixes for version 2

references

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed retrieval of the Datadog application key from AWS SSM Parameter Store.
    • Removed unused scaling adjustment parameters from the autoscaling configuration.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This change removes the retrieval of the Datadog application key from AWS SSM Parameter Store in the Datadog agent Terraform configuration. Additionally, it eliminates the scale_up_adjustment and scale_down_adjustment parameters from the ECS CloudWatch autoscaling module in the main Terraform configuration.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/datadog-agent.tf Removed the data source block for fetching the Datadog app key from AWS SSM Parameter Store.
src/main.tf Removed scale_up_adjustment and scale_down_adjustment parameters from the ECS autoscaling module.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Terraform
    participant AWS SSM
    participant Datadog Agent

    %% Old flow
    Note over Terraform, AWS SSM: (Old) Fetch Datadog app key from SSM if enabled
    Terraform->>AWS SSM: Get datadog_app_key
    AWS SSM-->>Terraform: Return app key
    Terraform->>Datadog Agent: Configure with app key

    %% New flow
    Note over Terraform, Datadog Agent: (New) SSM fetch for app key removed
    Terraform->>Datadog Agent: Configure (without SSM app key)
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

major, needs-test

Poem

A hop and a skip through the Terraform glade,
Out goes the app key, no SSM parade!
Autoscaling’s lighter, no more adjust fuss,
The code’s less cluttered—less for us to discuss.
🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Benbentwo Benbentwo added bugfix Change that restores intended behavior patch A minor, backward compatible change labels Jun 16, 2025
@mergify mergify bot requested review from a team June 16, 2025 19:47
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/main.tf (1)

454-455: Consider exposing cooldown settings to variables

Hardcoding scale_up_cooldown and scale_down_cooldown reduces flexibility. It’s better to surface these values as module inputs (with sensible defaults) so downstream consumers can adjust them without forking.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c0e675e and d9031fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/datadog-agent.tf (0 hunks)
  • src/main.tf (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • src/datadog-agent.tf
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: component / terraform / Lint (./src)
  • GitHub Check: component / terraform / bats
  • GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/main.tf (2)

444-453: Approve autoscaling basic configuration

The service_name, cluster_name, min_capacity, and max_capacity inputs align with the module’s API and look correct. Ensure that var.task reliably provides min_capacity/max_capacity in all deployment scenarios.


444-456: Verify removal of scale adjustment parameters

The PR removes the deprecated scale_up_adjustment and scale_down_adjustment parameters. Please confirm that cloudposse/ecs-cloudwatch-autoscaling/aws version 1.0.0 no longer requires those inputs and that your autoscaling policies behave as expected.

For cloudposse/ecs-cloudwatch-autoscaling/aws version 1.0.0, have the `scale_up_adjustment` and `scale_down_adjustment` variables been removed or deprecated?

@Benbentwo Benbentwo added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 16, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit a96bfc0 Jun 16, 2025
14 checks passed
@Benbentwo Benbentwo deleted the bugfix/ssm branch June 16, 2025 19:51
Copy link

These changes were released in v2.0.2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bugfix Change that restores intended behavior patch A minor, backward compatible change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants