Skip to content

Conversation

@missytake
Copy link
Contributor

I pulled out traefik support from #614 so we can think about it individually, and merge normal docker support first.

@hpk42
Copy link
Contributor

hpk42 commented Oct 9, 2025

why traefik and not any other alternative to acme?
It may be better to make using acmetool optional, and only document how to integrate non-acmetool things, providing some hooks or so.

@missytake missytake force-pushed the docker-rebase branch 4 times, most recently from d12782f to 8541139 Compare October 17, 2025 11:27
@Keonik1
Copy link
Collaborator

Keonik1 commented Oct 18, 2025

@hpk42
In my experience, Traefik has one of the best supports for working with Docker containers. All you need to do is specify the labels, and Traefik will do the rest.

In other alternatives (except for Kubernetes Ingress), this is much less convenient and native.

@lig
Copy link
Contributor

lig commented Oct 30, 2025

@Keonik1 Also, supporting Traefik opens up k3s as a supported platform which looks like a great choice (and a popular one) for hosting a small project and self-hosting in general.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants