Git norms doc

[tnrahim]

Adds
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mv-0hymSr2WIUgE-9l6P53M44Fd13nQ_QUpgxSIgKTU/edit
and
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WK673QArNxdJi-JSf2J30GhmNk45gyYF2WCPLfzE8a8/edit#heading=h.9s45exk8c5x4

into project docs

[tnrahim]

closes #270

[jkarpen]

@tnrahim I'm noticing in the "GitHub and Continuous Integration" page markdown preview there are a lot of headers showing up with ## in front of them. Not sure if that's rendering as you intended.

(Also just noticed a typo in "repository" in the screenshot above)

Also at the top of that page it says "bookmark your project's GitHub repo" and links to a generic public repo. I'm wondering if that could confuse people... Is the intention to replace that link with the actual project repo for each client where this gets published?

Aside from that I saw no issues with the "GitHub and Project Management" page.

[tnrahim]

Generic Repo
I used the generic repo to make the documentation more project agnostic. Teams can update that link to point to their particular project if they are personalizing these docs.

I've updated the other items as well.

[ian-r-rose]

The project management doc looks good to me. I'm thinking that a lot of the intro to git/github content could go in the "learning" tab, and at that point the project management doc might work better in the "Code Development" subsection. Thoughts @jkarpen?

[jkarpen]

The project management doc looks good to me. I'm thinking that a lot of the intro to git/github content could go in the "learning" tab, and at that point the project management doc might work better in the "Code Development" subsection. Thoughts @jkarpen?

I agree with that (moving the project management doc to Code Development). It does seem similar to some of the items in that section.

[tnrahim]

The project management doc looks good to me. I'm thinking that a lot of the intro to git/github content could go in the "learning" tab, and at that point the project management doc might work better in the "Code Development" subsection. Thoughts @jkarpen?

I agree with that (moving the project management doc to Code Development). It does seem similar to some of the items in that section.

Project Management doc has been moved to the code development section.