Skip to content

Conversation

omriyoffe-panw
Copy link
Contributor

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)

New/Edited policies (Delete if not relevant)

Description

Include a description of what makes it a violation and any relevant external links.

Fix

How does someone fix the issue in code and/or in runtime?

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my feature, policy, or fix is effective and works
  • New and existing tests pass locally with my changes

Copy link
Contributor

@bo156 bo156 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice job, please also add a test for it :)

@omriyoffe-panw omriyoffe-panw merged commit 0c04634 into main Sep 14, 2025
46 checks passed
@omriyoffe-panw omriyoffe-panw deleted the bugfix/tf-plan-nested branch September 14, 2025 11:58
Saarett pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2025
…le_complex_after_unknown (#7299)

* fix access to list by str in tf plan under _handle_complex_after_unknown

* ut
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants