refactor: Replace gil::detail::copy_n with std::copy_n

[marco-langer]

Description

This PR replaces Gil's gil::detail::copy_n with std::copy_n.

Tasklist

• Ensure all CI builds pass
• Review and approve

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 80.27%. Comparing base (151fd9c) to head (46497d0).
⚠️ Report is 96 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #686      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    80.32%   80.27%   -0.06%     
===========================================
  Files          117      117              
  Lines         5032     5019      -13     
===========================================
- Hits          4042     4029      -13     
  Misses         990      990              

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mloskot]

Added line #L244 was not covered by tests

Hmm, this one is interesting. I'd have expected those to be fully covered.

[marco-langer]

I don't see any test cases for core\algorithm\copy_pixels. The other specializations of struct copier_n are apparently triggered by some unrelated test cases from extension or image processing tests AFAIS.

Edit: this is not true, there are some legacy tests, which do not cover this case. However, the Jamfile in test\legacy says these tests should not be refactored or extended. Thus, should we rather add new copy_pixels tests in core\algorithm\copy_pixels.cpp?