-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
Updated README #186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated README #186
Conversation
* Moved the docs part of the README to the top * Updated the docs with the new logo
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
22-25
: Remove duplicate Documentation entry from Table of Contents.The Documentation section has been appropriately moved to the top, but it's still listed as item #6 in the Table of Contents. Since the section is now prominently featured at the beginning, consider removing the duplicate entry from the TOC for better organization.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: Build and Scan
- GitHub Check: docker
- GitHub Check: Analyze (go)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
29-31
: Verify image path and enhance caption.Please ensure:
- The image file exists at the specified path:
images/terminal.png
- Consider enhancing the caption to provide more context about the performance metrics, such as the environment specifications or test conditions used.
✅ Verification successful
Image path verified successfully
The image file exists at the specified path
images/terminal.png
, and the documentation accurately references it. The caption effectively communicates the key performance metric.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the terminal.png image exists if [ -f "images/terminal.png" ]; then echo "✓ Terminal image exists" else echo "✗ Terminal image not found at images/terminal.png" fiLength of output: 89
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅ |
Summary by CodeRabbit