Skip to content

Updated README #161

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024
Merged

Updated README #161

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2024

Conversation

naveensrinivasan
Copy link
Member

@naveensrinivasan naveensrinivasan commented Dec 3, 2024

  • Moved the docs part of the README to the top
  • Updated the docs with the new logo

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated logo image source in the README.
    • Added a new "Documentation" section with links to comprehensive guides.

* Moved the docs part of the README to the top
* Updated the docs with the new logo
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to the README.md file for the BitBom Minefield project. The image source for the project logo has been changed, and a new "Documentation" section has been added, which consolidates previous documentation content and provides a link to comprehensive guides. The overall structure of the document remains unchanged, ensuring clarity and accessibility in the project's documentation.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md - Updated image source from bitbomLogoAndName.png to bitbom-long-logo.png.
- Added a new section titled "Documentation" with a link to guides at https://bitbom.dev/docs/intro.
- Removed the previous "Documentation" section and integrated its content into the new section.

Possibly related PRs

  • Updated README to include offline capabilities #100: Updates the README.md to include a new section on "Air-Gapped Design Philosophy," relating to overall documentation structure changes.
  • Updated README #101: Modifies the README.md to emphasize the air-gapped nature of the solution and restructure the document, aligning with the main PR's focus on documentation clarity.
  • Clean up the readme and fix mistakes #147: Introduces changes to the README.md that clarify the initial setup process and modify command examples, relevant to overall documentation improvements.

Suggested reviewers

  • neilnaveen

🐰 In the meadow, changes bloom,
A logo brightens every room.
Documentation now shines so bright,
Guiding users, day and night.
With clarity, our path is clear,
Hop along, the guides are near! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

Line range hint 31-42: Consider updating the Table of Contents

The Table of Contents still includes a "Documentation" entry (#6) while we now have a documentation section at the top of the README. This might cause confusion for users. Consider either:

  1. Removing the duplicate documentation entry from the Table of Contents, or
  2. Renaming one of the sections to better reflect its specific purpose.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fbc0864 and 28c0b54.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • images/bitbom-long-logo.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • images/bitbomLogoAndName.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (3)

22-27: Documentation section is well-structured

The new documentation section is concisely written and well-positioned in the README, with proper separation using horizontal rules. This placement improves visibility and accessibility of the documentation link.


2-2: Verify the new logo image path and existence

The image path has been updated to images/bitbom-long-logo.png. Let's ensure the image exists and is properly referenced.

✅ Verification successful

Logo image path update is valid

The new logo image exists at the correct path images/bitbom-long-logo.png, and there are no lingering references to the old image name bitbomLogoAndName.png in the codebase. The path change is properly implemented.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the new logo image and any references to the old image

# Check if the new image exists
fd "bitbom-long-logo.png"

# Check for any remaining references to the old image name
rg "bitbomLogoAndName\.png"

Length of output: 83


22-27: Verify the documentation link accessibility

The documentation link https://bitbom.dev/docs/intro should be verified to ensure it's accessible and points to the correct documentation.

@naveensrinivasan naveensrinivasan enabled auto-merge (squash) December 3, 2024 21:08
@naveensrinivasan naveensrinivasan merged commit 3e1fbc5 into main Dec 3, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
@naveensrinivasan naveensrinivasan deleted the naveen/updateReadme branch December 3, 2024 21:09
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Dec 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants