-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
Updated README #161
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated README #161
Conversation
* Moved the docs part of the README to the top * Updated the docs with the new logo
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
Line range hint
31-42
: Consider updating the Table of ContentsThe Table of Contents still includes a "Documentation" entry (#6) while we now have a documentation section at the top of the README. This might cause confusion for users. Consider either:
- Removing the duplicate documentation entry from the Table of Contents, or
- Renaming one of the sections to better reflect its specific purpose.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
images/bitbom-long-logo.png
is excluded by!**/*.png
images/bitbomLogoAndName.png
is excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (3)
22-27
: Documentation section is well-structured
The new documentation section is concisely written and well-positioned in the README, with proper separation using horizontal rules. This placement improves visibility and accessibility of the documentation link.
2-2
: Verify the new logo image path and existence
The image path has been updated to images/bitbom-long-logo.png
. Let's ensure the image exists and is properly referenced.
✅ Verification successful
Logo image path update is valid
The new logo image exists at the correct path images/bitbom-long-logo.png
, and there are no lingering references to the old image name bitbomLogoAndName.png
in the codebase. The path change is properly implemented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence of the new logo image and any references to the old image
# Check if the new image exists
fd "bitbom-long-logo.png"
# Check for any remaining references to the old image name
rg "bitbomLogoAndName\.png"
Length of output: 83
22-27
: Verify the documentation link accessibility
The documentation link https://bitbom.dev/docs/intro
should be verified to ensure it's accessible and points to the correct documentation.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅ |
Summary by CodeRabbit