Skip to content

Conversation

strixy16
Copy link
Collaborator

@strixy16 strixy16 commented Dec 18, 2024

Didn't test updating from os to pathlib enough, but should be good now. Added basic test, needs to be expanded upon.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new variable for improved file path handling in the feature loading process.
    • Added a comment for clarity on retrieving the full path to the feature file.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated logic for removing the image type file from the feature files list.
  • Tests

    • Added a new test function to validate the functionality of the feature loading function.
    • Implemented a fixture for testing with a temporary feature file.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the loadFeatureFilesFromImageTypes function in the feature loader module and adds a corresponding test file. The primary change involves renaming a variable image_type_feature_file to feature_file_path while maintaining the existing logic for loading feature files. A new test case is created to validate the function's behavior, specifically checking the loading of feature files for a specified image type.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/readii/io/loaders/features.py Renamed image_type_feature_file to feature_file_path, updated file removal logic, uncommented path retrieval comment
tests/io/loaders/test_features.py Added new test function test_load_single_feature_file and fixture original_feature_file_path to validate feature file loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • jjjermiah

Poem

🐰 Hopping through code with glee,
Variables renamed, functions set free!
Feature files loaded, tests in sight,
Rabbit's refactor brings pure delight!
Code hops forward, clean and bright 🔍


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
tests/io/loaders/test_features.py (1)

8-9: Consider making the test data path configurable

The hardcoded path might cause issues in different environments or CI/CD pipelines. Consider using a pytest fixture that gets the path from an environment variable or configuration file.

 @pytest.fixture
 def extracted_feature_4D_lung():
-    return Path("tests/4D-lung/results/features/")
+    test_data_dir = Path(os.getenv("TEST_DATA_DIR", "tests/4D-lung/results/features/"))
+    if not test_data_dir.exists():
+        pytest.skip("Test data directory not found")
+    return test_data_dir
src/readii/io/loaders/features.py (2)

50-50: Consider using a more specific glob pattern

The current glob pattern *.csv might include unrelated CSV files. Consider using a more specific pattern that matches your feature file naming convention.

-    feature_file_list = sorted(extracted_feature_dir.glob("*.csv"))
+    feature_file_list = sorted(extracted_feature_dir.glob("*_features.csv"))  # adjust pattern to match your naming convention

Line range hint 1-15: Add type hints for local variables

While function parameters have type hints, local variables like feature_file_list and matching_files lack them. Consider adding type hints for better code maintainability.

+from typing import List
+
 def loadFeatureFilesFromImageTypes(...):
+    feature_file_list: List[Path] = []
+    matching_files: List[Path] = []
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a636a87 and 4c58b7f.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pixi.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/readii/io/loaders/features.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/io/loaders/test_features.py (1 hunks)

Comment on lines 11 to 15
def test_loadFeatureFilesFromImageTypes(extracted_feature_4D_lung):
feature_sets = loadFeatureFilesFromImageTypes(extracted_feature_4D_lung, image_types=["original"], drop_labels=False)
assert isinstance(feature_sets, dict), "Return should be a dictionary."
assert len(feature_sets) == 1, "Should only have one feature file per image type."
assert "original" in feature_sets, "Not finding the specified image type feature file (original) or keys are not correctly named." No newline at end of file
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Expand test coverage with additional test cases

The current test only covers the happy path with a single image type. Consider adding:

  1. Test with multiple image types
  2. Test with non-existent image types
  3. Test with drop_labels=True
  4. Test error conditions (invalid directory, invalid files)

Example additional test:

def test_loadFeatureFilesFromImageTypes_multiple_types(extracted_feature_4D_lung):
    feature_sets = loadFeatureFilesFromImageTypes(
        extracted_feature_4D_lung, 
        image_types=["original", "wavelet"],
        drop_labels=True
    )
    assert len(feature_sets) == 2
    assert all(key in feature_sets for key in ["original", "wavelet"])

def test_loadFeatureFilesFromImageTypes_invalid_type(extracted_feature_4D_lung):
    feature_sets = loadFeatureFilesFromImageTypes(
        extracted_feature_4D_lung,
        image_types=["nonexistent"],
        drop_labels=False
    )
    with pytest.raises(ValueError):
        assert not feature_sets

Comment on lines +73 to +75
feature_file_path = matching_files[0]
# Remove the image type file from the list of feature files
feature_file_list.remove(image_type_feature_file)
feature_file_list.remove(feature_file_path)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Avoid modifying the feature_file_list during iteration

Modifying the list while processing it could lead to race conditions or missed files. Consider using a set or maintaining a separate list of processed files.

-            feature_file_path = matching_files[0]  
-            # Remove the image type file from the list of feature files  
-            feature_file_list.remove(feature_file_path)
+            feature_file_path = matching_files[0]
+            # Keep track of processed files in a separate set
+            processed_files.add(feature_file_path)

Also, consider adding this at the beginning of the function:

processed_files = set()

Comment on lines 77 to 79
except Exception as e:
logger.warning(f"Error loading {image_type} feature csv files from {extracted_feature_dir}: {e}")
raise e
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve error handling consistency

The current error handling logs a warning and then raises the exception. This is inconsistent with other error handling in the function. Consider either:

  1. Logging an error and raising a specific exception, or
  2. Logging a warning and continuing to the next iteration
-        except Exception as e:
-            logger.warning(f"Error loading {image_type} feature csv files from {extracted_feature_dir}: {e}")
-            raise e
+        except Exception as e:
+            logger.error(f"Failed to process {image_type} feature files: {e}")
+            raise ValueError(f"Error processing {image_type} feature files: {e}") from e
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
except Exception as e:
logger.warning(f"Error loading {image_type} feature csv files from {extracted_feature_dir}: {e}")
raise e
except Exception as e:
logger.error(f"Failed to process {image_type} feature files: {e}")
raise ValueError(f"Error processing {image_type} feature files: {e}") from e

@strixy16 strixy16 marked this pull request as draft December 18, 2024 20:58
@strixy16 strixy16 marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2024 14:28
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/io/loaders/test_features.py (2)

1-6: Consider removing unused Path import if not needed for future tests

The Path import is currently unused in the code. However, if it's intended for upcoming tests as part of the os to pathlib transition, consider adding a TODO comment explaining its future use.

-from pathlib import Path
+# TODO: Path import will be used in upcoming pathlib transition tests
+from pathlib import Path
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)

5-5: pathlib.Path imported but unused

Remove unused import: pathlib.Path

(F401)


9-19: Enhance fixture robustness and maintainability

While the fixture is well-structured with session scope and reproducible data generation, consider these improvements:

 @pytest.fixture(scope="session")
-def original_feature_file_path(tmp_path_factory):
+def original_feature_file_path(tmp_path_factory: pytest.TempPathFactory) -> Path:
     # Create a 10x10 matrix with random float values between 0 and 1
     random_matrix = np.random.default_rng(seed=10).random((10,10))
     # Convert to dataframe and name the columns feature1, feature2, etc.
     random_feature_df = pd.DataFrame(random_matrix, columns=[f"feature_{i+1}" for i in range(10)])
     # Save the dataframe to a temporary file
     feature_file_path = tmp_path_factory.mktemp("feature") / "features_original.csv"
     random_feature_df.to_csv(feature_file_path)
+    assert feature_file_path.exists(), "Failed to create feature file"
     return feature_file_path
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4c58b7f and 1d84838.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/io/loaders/test_features.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
tests/io/loaders/test_features.py

5-5: pathlib.Path imported but unused

Remove unused import: pathlib.Path

(F401)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/io/loaders/test_features.py (2)

21-25: Expand test coverage beyond the happy path

The current test only verifies basic dictionary structure but doesn't validate:

  1. The actual content of loaded features
  2. Error cases
  3. Multiple image types
  4. The drop_labels parameter behavior

The previous review comment suggesting additional test cases is still applicable. Would you like me to help implement the suggested test cases?


16-16: Verify if the feature file naming pattern is documented

The test assumes a specific file naming pattern features_original.csv. Let's verify if this pattern is documented or configurable.

@strixy16 strixy16 merged commit 6272a03 into main Dec 19, 2024
18 checks passed
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 43.76%. Comparing base (875a6c3) to head (1d84838).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #98      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   41.66%   43.76%   +2.09%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines        1452     1451       -1     
==========================================
+ Hits          605      635      +30     
+ Misses        847      816      -31     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant