Skip to content

Conversation

jjjermiah
Copy link
Contributor

@jjjermiah jjjermiah commented Feb 6, 2025

  • copied over the pytest config from med-imagetools

  • can easily view errors in gha during pytest without going into the action logs

  • small fix to the fixtures that delete temporary paths and are used by multiple tests (can cause errors during parallel runs)

  • also cleanups for each PRs gha caches

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Enhanced test execution with more detailed feedback and immediate halt on failures for quicker diagnostics.
    • Introduced a comprehensive test summary report for improved visibility of test outcomes.
    • Streamlined test command configurations for simpler and more efficient execution.
    • Improved test fixture management to ensure more robust setup and cleanup during test runs.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped due to path filters

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pixi.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including **/dist/** will override the default block on the dist directory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the testing configuration and workflow across the project. In the CI/CD workflow, the pixi command in the Unit-Tests job is enhanced with verbosity flags and now stops on the first failure, with an additional step added to generate a JUnit test summary using test-summary/action@v2. A new pytest.ini file introduces comprehensive testing configurations including coverage reporting, test discovery, and warning filters. The pyproject.toml test task command is simplified to run pytest with this new configuration file. Test fixture definitions in tests/test_feature_extraction.py are modified to use module-scoped lifecycles and include conditional cleanup logic. Additionally, a new GitHub Actions workflow is added to clean caches when pull requests are closed, and an old CI/CD workflow file is removed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.github/workflows/ci-cd.yml Updated the pixi command in the Unit-Tests job to include -s -vv flags; added a new step using test-summary/action@v2 to generate a JUnit test summary, running regardless of test outcome; coverage upload step unchanged.
.github/workflows/cleanup_caches.yml Added a new workflow triggered on pull request closure to delete caches associated with the PR branch using GitHub CLI commands.
.github/workflows/ci-cd.yml.disabled Deleted old CI/CD workflow file that included unit testing, deployment, publishing, and Docker image build jobs.
config/pytest.ini Added new pytest configuration file specifying minimum pytest version, cache directory, console output style, verbosity, coverage reporting, test discovery patterns, and warning filters.
pyproject.toml Simplified [tool.pixi.feature.test.tasks.test] command from a detailed multi-line list with coverage and parallelism options to a single command string invoking pytest with the new config file.
tests/test_feature_extraction.py Changed @pytest.fixture decorators to use scope="module" and updated cleanup logic to only unlink files if they exist, improving fixture robustness.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant CI as CI/CD Pipeline
    participant Executor as Test Executor
    participant Summary as JUnit Summary Step
    participant Uploader as Coverage Uploader

    Dev->>CI: Push commit with changes
    CI->>Executor: Start Unit-Tests job
    Executor->>Executor: Run tests with "pixi run -e ${{ matrix.env }} test -s -vv"
    Executor->>Summary: Always execute test-summary step
    Summary-->>CI: Produce JUnit test report
    CI->>Uploader: Conditionally upload coverage report
    Uploader-->>CI: Coverage artifact processed
Loading

Poem

🐇 In tunnels deep where tests do run,
With flags and reports, the work is done.
From fixtures scoped to caches cleared,
A bunny’s joy is now appeared.
Hopping through code with nimble feet,
These changes make the workflow sweet! 🐰✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
config/pytest.ini (1)

63-69: Consider adding more specific warning filters.

While the current warning filters are good, consider being more specific about which DeprecationWarnings to ignore.

 filterwarnings =
-    ignore::DeprecationWarning
+    ignore::DeprecationWarning:pytest.*
+    ignore::DeprecationWarning:_pytest.*
     # Add specific warning messages to ignore here
     ignore::UserWarning:pydicom.*
.github/workflows/ci-cd.yml (1)

44-50: Fix trailing spaces in YAML.

Remove trailing spaces to maintain consistent formatting.

      - name: JUnit Test Summary
        id: pytest-summary
        uses: test-summary/action@v2
-        with: 
+        with:
          paths: .cache/test-results/**/*.xml
          show: "fail,skip"
        if: always()
🧰 Tools
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)

[error] 47-47: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a11db1 and 8b98d87.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pixi.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd.yml (2 hunks)
  • config/pytest.ini (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_feature_extraction.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/ci-cd.yml

[error] 43-43: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)


[error] 47-47: trailing spaces

(trailing-spaces)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (8)
  • GitHub Check: Unit-Tests (windows-latest, py312)
  • GitHub Check: Unit-Tests (windows-latest, py311)
  • GitHub Check: Unit-Tests (windows-latest, py310)
  • GitHub Check: Unit-Tests (macos-14, py312)
  • GitHub Check: Unit-Tests (macos-14, py311)
  • GitHub Check: Unit-Tests (macos-14, py310)
  • GitHub Check: Unit-Tests (macos-latest, py311)
  • GitHub Check: Unit-Tests (macos-latest, py310)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
tests/test_feature_extraction.py (2)

47-57: LGTM! Improved fixture management with module scope and safer cleanup.

The changes enhance test reliability by:

  • Using module scope to reduce fixture setup/teardown overhead
  • Adding existence check before cleanup to prevent errors during parallel test execution

58-68: LGTM! Consistent fixture improvements applied.

The same improvements have been correctly applied to the lung4DMetadataPath fixture.

config/pytest.ini (3)

1-11: LGTM! Well-structured basic configuration.

The configuration properly sets:

  • Minimum pytest version for compatibility
  • Cache directory for test artifacts
  • Progress-style console output for better visibility

12-45: LGTM! Comprehensive test execution configuration.

The addopts section effectively configures:

  • Detailed test output with --showlocals
  • Coverage reporting in multiple formats
  • Parallel test execution with load grouping
  • JUnit XML reporting for CI integration

51-61: LGTM! Clear test discovery patterns.

Well-defined patterns for:

  • Test paths
  • Excluded directories
  • Test file naming conventions
pyproject.toml (1)

76-78: LGTM! Simplified test execution configuration.

Test command now properly uses the centralized pytest.ini configuration, making it easier to maintain and modify test settings.

.github/workflows/ci-cd.yml (1)

32-34: LGTM! Enhanced test execution visibility.

Added verbosity flags (-s -vv) to improve test output in CI logs.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.45%. Comparing base (978bdb5) to head (c8ca060).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #117       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   50.25%   76.45%   +26.19%     
===========================================
  Files          36       41        +5     
  Lines        1546     2009      +463     
===========================================
+ Hits          777     1536      +759     
+ Misses        769      473      -296     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jjjermiah jjjermiah requested a review from strixy16 February 6, 2025 15:56
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/cleanup_caches.yml (4)

1-6: Filter to merged pull requests only
Triggering on every closed pull request may clear caches for PRs that were simply closed without merging. To avoid unnecessary deletions, add a merge check at the job level.

 on:
   pull_request:
     types:
       - closed
 jobs:
   cleanup:
+    if: ${{ github.event.pull_request.merged == true }}
     runs-on: ubuntu-latest

12-15: Use the configured repository context when listing caches
You define GH_REPO, but the gh cache list invocation doesn’t reference it. Either remove the unused env var or explicitly pass --repo $GH_REPO so you’re cleaning the correct repository.

-          cacheKeysForPR=$(gh cache list --ref $BRANCH --limit 100 --json id --jq '.[].id')
+          cacheKeysForPR=$(gh cache list --repo $GH_REPO --ref $BRANCH --limit 100 --json id --jq '.[].id')

16-23: Leverage step-level continue-on-error instead of set +e
Silencing errors mid-script can mask unexpected failures. It’s more idiomatic to use continue-on-error: true on the step itself.

-      - name: Cleanup
-        run: |
-          ## Setting this to not fail the workflow while deleting cache keys.
-          set +e
+      - name: Cleanup
+        continue-on-error: true
+        run: |
           echo "Fetching list of cache key"
           cacheKeysForPR=$(gh cache list --repo $GH_REPO --ref $BRANCH --limit 100 --json id --jq '.[].id')
           echo "Deleting caches..."

24-27: Add explicit write permissions for cache operations
To delete caches programmatically, the GITHUB_TOKEN needs actions: write permission. Declare this at the top of the workflow for clarity and security.

+permissions:
+  actions: write

 name: cleanup caches by a branch
 on:
   pull_request:
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b98d87 and c752285.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pixi.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd.yml.disabled (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/cleanup_caches.yml (1 hunks)
  • pyproject.toml (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/ci-cd.yml.disabled
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pyproject.toml
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/cleanup_caches.yml (1)

9-10:

✅ Verification successful

Verify GH CLI version supports cache commands
gh cache list and gh cache delete are relatively new subcommands. Ensure the Ubuntu runner’s GitHub CLI version includes them to avoid “command not found” errors.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Confirm installed GH CLI version and availability of cache commands
gh --version
gh cache --help

Length of output: 686


GitHub CLI cache commands are supported on ubuntu-latest
Verified that gh version 2.62.0 on the Ubuntu runner includes both gh cache list and gh cache delete. No changes required.

@strixy16 strixy16 merged commit 389a003 into main Apr 22, 2025
20 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in READII-2-ROQC Pipeline Apr 22, 2025
@strixy16 strixy16 deleted the jjjermiah/developmen/pytest-help branch April 22, 2025 14:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants