Skip to content

Conversation

@apeteri
Copy link
Member

@apeteri apeteri commented Oct 10, 2025

This functionality was removed in commit d27a406 but is still needed
when the itemized changes can not be sent to clients in their entirety
due to resource limitations.
@apeteri apeteri requested review from AAAlinaaa and cmark October 10, 2025 16:01
@apeteri apeteri self-assigned this Oct 10, 2025
Comment on lines +147 to +150
// These descriptions are registered as changed components for some reason, possibly due to language refset members
assertThat(compare.getChangedComponents())
.hasSize(1)
.containsAnyElementsOf(newDescriptionIds);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test gives a suprising result here but we haven't figured it out yet. @cmark any guesses?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 10, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 64.43%. Comparing base (999485f) to head (cd4e5ea).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on 9.x.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                9.x    #1419      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     64.40%   64.43%   +0.03%     
- Complexity    12791    12809      +18     
============================================
  Files          1620     1620              
  Lines         57761    57815      +54     
  Branches       5682     5685       +3     
============================================
+ Hits          37199    37254      +55     
  Misses        18189    18189              
+ Partials       2373     2372       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Member

@nagyo nagyo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Other than the flaky test, the change itself looks good to me!

@cmark cmark added the on hold label Oct 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants