-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 490
Add port environment variables for Aspire integration #1942
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 3 commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -19,4 +19,17 @@ | |
config.SetApplicationName(Constants.ToolName); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
return await app.RunAsync(args); | ||
var arguments = new List<string>(args); | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I prefer that you not modify the arguments directly and instead add your logic to https://github.com/aws/aws-lambda-dotnet/blob/feature/lambdatesttool-v2/Tools/LambdaTestTool-v2/src/Amazon.Lambda.TestTool/Commands/RunCommand.cs or https://github.com/aws/aws-lambda-dotnet/blob/feature/lambdatesttool-v2/Tools/LambdaTestTool-v2/src/Amazon.Lambda.TestTool/Commands/Settings/RunCommandSettings.cs There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Done |
||
|
||
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("LAMBDA_RUNTIME_API_PORT"))) | ||
{ | ||
arguments.Add("--port"); | ||
arguments.Add(Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("LAMBDA_RUNTIME_API_PORT")!); | ||
} | ||
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("API_GATEWAY_EMULATOR_PORT"))) | ||
{ | ||
arguments.Add("--api-gateway-emulator-port"); | ||
arguments.Add(Environment.GetEnvironmentVariable("API_GATEWAY_EMULATOR_PORT")!); | ||
} | ||
|
||
return await app.RunAsync(arguments); |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ public static (IDictionary<string, string>, IDictionary<string, IList<string>>) | |
{ | ||
var key = lowerCaseKeyName ? header.Key.ToLower() : header.Key; | ||
singleValueHeaders[key] = header.Value.Last() ?? ""; | ||
multiValueHeaders[key] = [.. header.Value]; | ||
multiValueHeaders[key] = [.. header.Value!]; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think the null warnings happening in this file were a false positive. They warnings only show up when doing |
||
} | ||
|
||
return (singleValueHeaders, multiValueHeaders); | ||
|
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ public static (IDictionary<string, string>, IDictionary<string, IList<string>>) | |
foreach (var param in query) | ||
{ | ||
singleValueParams[param.Key] = param.Value.Last() ?? ""; | ||
multiValueParams[param.Key] = [.. param.Value]; | ||
multiValueParams[param.Key] = [.. param.Value!]; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return (singleValueParams, multiValueParams); | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there no better way for us to have the same behavior without using an obsolete method? What if they drop it in .NET10?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gcbeattyAWS Can you answer this question since this was your change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so i tried looking for an alternative function that was not deprecated and produced the same output that we needed - but i could not find any. i think i tried 5 or 6 different ways and spent a couple hours on it. If we want to ensure the function never gets dropped I think we could just re-implement/copy their source code for it no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not worried about the method being dropped. Methods being dropped from the BCL is a big deal that is rarely done.