Skip to content

Conversation

@Amitverma0509
Copy link

@Amitverma0509 Amitverma0509 commented Oct 15, 2025

Replaced custom mkdirAll function with os.MkdirAll for directory creation.

We want to ensure high quality of the packages. Make sure that you've checked the boxes below before sending a pull request.

Not every repository (project) will require every option, but most projects should. Check the Contribution Guidelines for details.

  • The repo documentation has a pkg.go.dev link.
  • The repo documentation has a coverage service link.
  • The repo documentation has a goreportcard link.
  • The repo has a version-numbered release and a go.mod file.
  • The repo has a continuous integration process that automatically runs tests that must pass before new pull requests are merged.
  • Continuous integration is used to attempt to catch issues prior to releasing this package to end-users.

Please provide some links to your package to ease the review

  • forge link (github.com, gitlab.com, etc):
  • pkg.go.dev:
  • goreportcard.com:
  • coverage service link (codecov, coveralls, etc.):

Pull Request content

  • The package has been added to the list in alphabetical order.
  • The package has an appropriate description with correct grammar.
  • As far as I know, the package has not been listed here before.

Category quality

Note that new categories can be added only when there are 3 packages or more.

Packages added a long time ago might not meet the current guidelines anymore. It would be very helpful if you could check 3-5 packages above and below your submission to ensure that they also still meet the Quality Standards.

Please delete one of the following lines:

  • The packages around my addition still meet the Quality Standards.
  • I removed the following packages around my addition: (please give a short reason for each removal)

Thanks for your PR, you're awesome! 😎

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Simplified directory creation logic to reduce redundant checks and streamline control flow.
    • Improved error handling for clearer feedback if directory setup fails.
    • No changes to user-facing behavior.

Replaced custom mkdirAll function with os.MkdirAll for directory creation.
@github-actions
Copy link

Automated Quality Checks (from CONTRIBUTING minimum standards)

  • Repo link: missing
  • pkg.go.dev: missing
  • goreportcard: missing
  • coverage: missing

These checks are a best-effort automation and do not replace human review.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2025

Walkthrough

Refactors dropCreateDir to remove a helper and call os.MkdirAll directly, wrapping any error as "mkdirAll: %w". Eliminates prior stat-based checks and the intermediate mkdirAll function. No exported APIs changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Directory creation logic
main.go
In dropCreateDir, replaced calls to a local mkdirAll helper with direct os.MkdirAll(dir, 0755) and unified error wrapping. Removed the helper and its existence-check logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  actor Caller
  participant D as dropCreateDir
  participant OS as os.MkdirAll

  Caller->>D: dropCreateDir(dir)
  D->>OS: MkdirAll(dir, 0755)
  alt success
    OS-->>D: nil
    D-->>Caller: nil
  else error
    OS-->>D: err
    note right of D: wrap as "mkdirAll: %w"
    D-->>Caller: wrapped error
  end
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

I hopped past helpers, light and spry,
One call to carve a burrow nigh;
No stat to check, no extra trail—
Just mkdir’s path, if fail then wail.
Thump-thump! The code now clean and small,
A snug new den with one clear call.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title accurately and succinctly describes the primary change of replacing a custom directory creation helper with os.MkdirAll, making it concise and clear.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between afa3ba4 and 96ea9b7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • main.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
**/*.go

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.go: Use standard formatting (gofmt) and idiomatic Go style
Favor small, testable functions in Go
Keep exported Go APIs documented with Go-style comments
Maintain ≥80% coverage for non-data packages and ≥90% for data packages when adding new testable Go code

Files:

  • main.go
{**/*.go,.github/scripts/**/*.js}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Use American English spelling in code comments

Files:

  • main.go
🪛 GitHub Actions: tests
main.go

[error] 127-127: go test failed. undefined: mkdirAll. Command: 'go test main_test.go main.go'.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
main.go (1)

117-118: LGTM! Clean refactoring.

The direct use of os.MkdirAll simplifies the code appropriately.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@phanirithvij
Copy link
Collaborator

ci tests are failing, could you recheck the implemetation.

@phanirithvij phanirithvij added pending-submitter-response go Pull requests that update Go code labels Oct 16, 2025
Copy link
Owner

avelino commented Oct 17, 2025

Hi @Amitverma0509, the automated checks for this PR failed. Please review the build logs and fix the issues. Specifically, the tests/Running test and PR Quality Checks/quality-check checks failed. Please address these and re-request a review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants