Add GitLab Merge Alert - WeChat Work notification service

[Alfonsxh]

Add GitLab Merge Alert to DevOps Tools section.

GitLab Merge Alert is a Go-based notification service that bridges GitLab merge requests with WeChat Work (企业微信), solving the critical communication gap for Chinese development teams using GitLab.

• Production ready with Docker support for easy deployment
• Well documented in English and Chinese
• Actively maintained
• MIT License

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Expanded README’s DevOps Tools with “GitLab Merge Alert,” a GitLab merge request notification service integrating WeChat Work (企业微信) for real-time code review alerts.
  • Includes Chinese naming for clarity (企业微信).
  • Improves discoverability of GitLab notification integrations.
  • Documentation-only update; no functional, logic, or error-handling changes.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Added a new bullet in README.md under DevOps Tools describing “GitLab Merge Alert,” a GitLab merge request notification service with WeChat Work integration. No code or logic changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation update README.md	Added a DevOps Tools entry for “GitLab Merge Alert” describing GitLab MR notifications with WeChat Work integration.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A nibble of docs, a hop in the readme lane,
New alerts thump-thump for every codegrain.
GitLab whispers, WeChat sings—
I twitch my ears for merging pings.
Carrot-shaped checks, approvals in sight—
Ship it quick, then moonlight bite! 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The title succinctly describes the addition of the GitLab Merge Alert notification service integrating with WeChat Work, which is the central change introduced in this PR, making it clear and specific for reviewers and future readers.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df406ab and 578ccbd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)

• GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

🔇 Additional comments (1)

README.md (1)

3304-3304: Addition looks good.

Entry follows section ordering and description style. Thanks for keeping it tidy.

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

• Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
• Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

Automated Quality Checks (from CONTRIBUTING minimum standards)

• Repo link: missing
• pkg.go.dev: missing
• goreportcard: missing
• coverage: missing

These checks are a best-effort automation and do not replace human review.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to awesome-go. We will review your contribution as soon as possible.

Make sure you add the links in the body of the pull request that are requested in the contribution guide:

• repo link: @Not provided
• pkg.go.dev: @Not provided
• goreportcard.com: @Not provided
• coverage: @Not provided

Your project is under review. It may take a few days to be approved.

[github-actions]

Automated Quality Checks (from CONTRIBUTING minimum standards)

• Repo link: missing
• pkg.go.dev: missing
• goreportcard: missing
• coverage: missing

These checks are a best-effort automation and do not replace human review.

[avelino]

Please add pkg.go.dev, Go Report Card and coverage links and confirm the project has at least 5 months of history, a license, go.mod and a versioned release. Once updated, we can review again.

[avelino]

Please add pkg.go.dev, Go Report Card and coverage links and confirm the project has at least 5 months of history, a license, go.mod and a versioned release. Once updated, we can review again.