Search results

Is ERC4973 backwards compatible with ERC721

Status: Open.

#63 In attestate/ERC4973;

· umerarif01 opened on Feb 12, 2023

Replace <code>function getHash()</code> with eip-5267

Status: Open.

#62 In attestate/ERC4973;

· TimDaub opened on Jan 20, 2023

Make most external interface functions overrideable like e.g. OZ's ERC721 implementation

Status: Open.

#61 In attestate/ERC4973;

· TimDaub opened on Jan 12, 2023

Implement burn and issue auth

Status: Open.

#60 In attestate/ERC4973;

· TimDaub opened on Jan 12, 2023

An additional <code>bytes calldata data</code> to give and take could help extending the interface's functionality

Status: Open.

#59 In attestate/ERC4973;

· TimDaub opened on Jan 12, 2023

implement eip-5267 for structured eip-712 domain retrieval

Status: Open.

#49 In attestate/ERC4973;

· TimDaub opened on Sep 4, 2022

consider making _mint private so that it is absolutely not used by implementers

Status: Open.

#48 In attestate/ERC4973;

· TimDaub opened on Sep 4, 2022

testTakeWithDifferentTokenURI

Status: Open.

#47 In attestate/ERC4973;

· ra-phael opened on Aug 23, 2022

Consider adding totalSupply

Status: Open.

#44 In attestate/ERC4973;

· rahulrumalla opened on Aug 9, 2022

Is it a problem that <code>testTakeEOA</code> and <code>testGiveEOA</code> produce the same validation signature?

questionFurther information is requestedFurther information is requested

Status: Open.

#42 In attestate/ERC4973;

· TimDaub opened on Aug 4, 2022

Now that function burn was renamed to function unequip we can't distinguish between someone disassociating themselves or "trashing" an item and someone unequipping it

Status: Open.

#36 In attestate/ERC4973;

· TimDaub opened on Jul 8, 2022

consider foundry recommendation on how to test EIP-712

Status: Open.

#25 In attestate/ERC4973;

· TimDaub opened on Jun 24, 2022