-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
Stoppable Submissions in Rust #11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
adamreichold
wants to merge
1
commit into
ashvardanian:main-dev
Choose a base branch
from
adamreichold:dont-stop
base: main-dev
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why use an out pointer instead of a return value?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My initial idea was that the overhead might be lower as those work items which do not want to stop the pool (so basically all but one) can just ignore the additional argument (instead of producing a useless
falseas a return value). I should pull the initialization out of the loop though so that the worker loop does not pay the price of it for each work item...I think there is an ever nicer way which does not need to touch the trampoline signature at all but using the identity of the
stop_trampoline, c.f. adamreichold/fork-join-scope@cdb63bf But transplanting it here is not that trivial because of the rules around function items/pointers and their comparison. So personally, I would prefer to switch to usingdyn Fn(usize) + Syncas the work items instead of manually splitting context and trampoline first before implementing that.