-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
New transaction worker proposal #679
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
98ab40c to
1d973c0
Compare
banool
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks great, much much simpler, and actually more powerful thanks to the failed seqnum handling behavior (was the previous version correctly handling gaps due to rejected txns? I don't think so).
I suppose next step is to add events / signals / etc that the caller can subscribe to?
ae1eeb4 to
56d12f8
Compare
2de2aba to
dd334ba
Compare
dd334ba to
b9a91ed
Compare
|
@hardsetting is there a plan to get this in? I'd like to use the transaction worker but assume this version is better? |
Description
Proposal for new transaction worker design, to overcome some promise resolution issues with the current design.
Test Plan
Testing using the gas station's load tester
Will add CI later
Related Links
Checklist
pnpm fmt?CHANGELOG.md?