Skip to content

chore: DSCrudBinding test fixes #40313

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

brayn003
Copy link
Contributor

@brayn003 brayn003 commented Apr 18, 2025

Description

Fixes Cy test cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/ExistingApps/v1.9.24/DSCrudAndBindings_Spec.ts

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.Git"

🔍 Cypress test results

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/14533163241
Commit: 4e85113
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.Git
Spec:


Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:38:17 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added a console log message for Mongo CRUD page validation in the relevant test case.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 18, 2025

Walkthrough

A console log statement was added to the Mongo CRUD page validation section of a Cypress test case. This log outputs "Mongo CRUD page validation" just before the deployment preview and related assertions. No other changes to code logic, structure, or error handling were introduced.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/ExistingApps/v1.9.24/DSCrudAndBindings_Spec.ts Added a console log before Mongo CRUD page validation.

Suggested labels

skip-changelog, ok-to-test, Git Product

Poem

A log now whispers in the test,
"Mongo CRUD page validation," it confessed.
With clarity for those who scan,
Debugging's easier, that's the plan!
Console sings, the test proceeds,
Onward to validate Mongo deeds.

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog label Apr 18, 2025
@brayn003 brayn003 added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Apr 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/ExistingApps/v1.9.24/DSCrudAndBindings_Spec.ts (1)

72-72: Replace console.log with cy.log for better Cypress reporting
Use cy.log so the message is visible in the Cypress Command Log instead of the Node console.

- console.log("Mongo CRUD page validation");
+ cy.log("Mongo CRUD page validation");
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5d22b8 and 4e85113.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/ExistingApps/v1.9.24/DSCrudAndBindings_Spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`app/client/cypress/**/**.*`: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that: - Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation. ...

app/client/cypress/**/**.*: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that:

  • Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation.
  • Avoid using cy.wait in code.
  • Avoid using cy.pause in code.
  • Avoid using agHelper.sleep().
  • Use locator variables for locators and do not use plain strings.
  • Use data-* attributes for selectors.
  • Avoid Xpaths, Attributes and CSS path.
  • Avoid selectors like .btn.submit or button[type=submit].
  • Perform logins via API with LoginFromAPI.
  • Perform logout via API with LogOutviaAPI.
  • Perform signup via API with SignupFromAPI.
  • Avoid using it.only.
  • Avoid using after and aftereach in test cases.
  • Use multiple assertions for expect statements.
  • Avoid using strings for assertions.
  • Do not use duplicate filenames even with different paths.
  • Avoid using agHelper.Sleep, this.Sleep in any file in code.
  • app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/ExistingApps/v1.9.24/DSCrudAndBindings_Spec.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: perform-test / rts-build / build
  • GitHub Check: perform-test / server-build / server-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: client-unit-tests / client-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: client-lint / client-lint
  • GitHub Check: client-prettier / prettier-check
  • GitHub Check: client-build / client-build

@brayn003 brayn003 removed the request for review from ApekshaBhosale April 18, 2025 09:59
Copy link

This PR has not seen activitiy for a while. It will be closed in 7 days unless further activity is detected.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Apr 25, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 2, 2025

This PR has been closed because of inactivity.

@github-actions github-actions bot closed this May 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ok-to-test Required label for CI skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog Stale
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant