Skip to content

[SPARK-52277] Upgrade Docker tags to 4.0.0 instead of 4.0.0-preview2 #171

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun commented May 23, 2025

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This PR aims to use Spark docker image tag 4.0.0 instead of 4.0.0-preview2.

Why are the changes needed?

To use the official one instead of the preview.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

Manual review.

Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?

No.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

This PR will be ready after the release manager publish the docker image.

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun marked this pull request as ready for review May 24, 2025 03:18
@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

This PR is ready.

$ docker run -it --rm apache/spark:4.0.0 /opt/spark/bin/spark-shell --version
WARNING: Using incubator modules: jdk.incubator.vector
Welcome to
      ____              __
     / __/__  ___ _____/ /__
    _\ \/ _ \/ _ `/ __/  '_/
   /___/ .__/\_,_/_/ /_/\_\   version 4.0.0
      /_/

Using Scala version 2.13.16, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, 17.0.15
Branch HEAD
Compiled by user wenchen on 2025-05-19T07:58:03Z
Revision fa33ea000a0bda9e5a3fa1af98e8e85b8cc5e4d4
Url https://github.com/apache/spark
Type --help for more information.

@dongjoon-hyun
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you, @viirya . Merged to main.

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun deleted the SPARK-52277 branch May 24, 2025 03:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants