TableProvider to skip files in the folder which non relevant to selected reader
#16487
+203
−4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
core
comphead
changed the title
comphead
changed the title
TableProvider to skip files in the folder which non relevant to selected reader
comphead
commented
Jun 24, 2025
| @@ -125,6 +125,13 @@ impl TableProviderFactory for ListingTableFactory { | |||
| // specifically for parquet file format. | |||
| // See: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/7317 | |||
| None => { | |||
| // if the folder then rewrite a file path as 'path/*.parquet' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is an actual fix
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Which issue does this PR close?
datafusionread parquet folders if non parquet files exists #16460 .Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?